The American Journal of International Law, Volume 31American Society of International Law, 1937 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 73
Page 292
... Congress in declaring war is usually decisive . In fact every declaration of war that has been made by Congress was made on the initiative of the President and in no case would there probably have been a declaration of war without his ...
... Congress in declaring war is usually decisive . In fact every declaration of war that has been made by Congress was made on the initiative of the President and in no case would there probably have been a declaration of war without his ...
Page 535
... Congress intended to withdraw that protection . Cf. Becker Co. v . Cummings , supra , 80. We find nothing to warrant that inference . District of Columbia v . Eslin , 183 U. S. 62 , gives no support to petitioners ' contention . Clearly ...
... Congress intended to withdraw that protection . Cf. Becker Co. v . Cummings , supra , 80. We find nothing to warrant that inference . District of Columbia v . Eslin , 183 U. S. 62 , gives no support to petitioners ' contention . Clearly ...
Page 679
... Congress decided to repudiate and not again to enter upon . In the Debt Funding Agreement of 1930 with Germany it is expressly provided that , as in the case of other debtor governments owing to the United States infinitely more , the ...
... Congress decided to repudiate and not again to enter upon . In the Debt Funding Agreement of 1930 with Germany it is expressly provided that , as in the case of other debtor governments owing to the United States infinitely more , the ...
Contents
Fel | 31 |
THE FIFTEENTH YEAR OF THE PERMANENT COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE | |
CONTENTS OF VOLUME THIRTYONE | |
33 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted agreement amended application arbitration arms Article 16 Assembly Belgium belligerent blockade boundary Britain British Cecil Hurst citizens civil clause Commissariat for Foreign Commission Committee Conference Congress contraband contract coöperation Council countries Court of International Covenant declared delegation diplomatic drug Ecuador effect embargo execution exportation extradition force Foreign Affairs France Geneva German Government Ibid insurgents Inter-American international law JOURNAL judgment judicial July June jurisdiction League of Nations legislation letters rogatory London March 11 ment Mexico Mongolian People's Republic munitions neutral Neutrality Act non-intervention obligations offences organization Pan American Pan American Union parties peace People's Commissariat Permanent Court ports present President principle problem proposal Protocol provisions question Quincy Wright recognition recognized regard relations rules Secretary Sept ships Soviet Spain Spanish Spanish civil war Stat Statute Supp territory tion trade Treaty Series United vessels Washington whales