The American Journal of International Law, Volume 31American Society of International Law, 1937 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 134
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES VALENTINE , et al . v . UNITED STATES ex rel . NEIDECKER * Decided November 9 , 1936 Under the Extradition Treaty of 1909 between the United States and France , which pro- vides that " Neither of the ...
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES VALENTINE , et al . v . UNITED STATES ex rel . NEIDECKER * Decided November 9 , 1936 Under the Extradition Treaty of 1909 between the United States and France , which pro- vides that " Neither of the ...
Page 258
... United States The so - called " neutrality laws " of the United States are statutory pro- visions , a part of the penal law of the United States , and should be clearly distinguished from the obligations imposed upon the United States ...
... United States The so - called " neutrality laws " of the United States are statutory pro- visions , a part of the penal law of the United States , and should be clearly distinguished from the obligations imposed upon the United States ...
Page 259
... United States were ingeniously avoided . In 1913 Mexican troops taking refuge in the United States were in- terned in exercise of the President's power to secure compliance with the ob- ligations of the United States under international ...
... United States were ingeniously avoided . In 1913 Mexican troops taking refuge in the United States were in- terned in exercise of the President's power to secure compliance with the ob- ligations of the United States under international ...
Contents
Fel | 31 |
THE FIFTEENTH YEAR OF THE PERMANENT COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE | |
CONTENTS OF VOLUME THIRTYONE | |
33 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adopted agreement amended application arbitration arms Article 16 Assembly Belgium belligerent blockade boundary Britain British Cecil Hurst citizens civil clause Commissariat for Foreign Commission Committee Conference Congress contraband contract coöperation Council countries Court of International Covenant declared delegation diplomatic drug Ecuador effect embargo execution exportation extradition force Foreign Affairs France Geneva German Government Ibid insurgents Inter-American international law JOURNAL judgment judicial July June jurisdiction League of Nations legislation letters rogatory London March 11 ment Mexico Mongolian People's Republic munitions neutral Neutrality Act non-intervention obligations offences organization Pan American Pan American Union parties peace People's Commissariat Permanent Court ports present President principle problem proposal Protocol provisions question Quincy Wright recognition recognized regard relations rules Secretary Sept ships Soviet Spain Spanish Spanish civil war Stat Statute Supp territory tion trade Treaty Series United vessels Washington whales