Reports of Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Cases, Volume 88Published at the Patent Office Sales Branch, 1971 - Design protection |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 87
Page 83
... claim , against which the objection of prior claiming was not pressed . I turn now to the main point in dispute . This concerns the claims to a mould and it is sufficient to consider the patentees ' claim 1 and compare it with claim 1 ...
... claim , against which the objection of prior claiming was not pressed . I turn now to the main point in dispute . This concerns the claims to a mould and it is sufficient to consider the patentees ' claim 1 and compare it with claim 1 ...
Page 84
... claim 1 is well founded . Moreover , even if Mr. Terry were right in his submission , I do not think the patentees ' claim 1 would necessarily be saved , since although a claim to a mould 10 is obviously different from a claim to a ...
... claim 1 is well founded . Moreover , even if Mr. Terry were right in his submission , I do not think the patentees ' claim 1 would necessarily be saved , since although a claim to a mould 10 is obviously different from a claim to a ...
Page 89
... claim 1 of patent No. 755,462 is included in claim 1 of patent No. 716,771 , they say : " But it is not , as an invention , itself the subject of any distinct claim to protection in the latter patent . In our judgment , the language of ...
... claim 1 of patent No. 755,462 is included in claim 1 of patent No. 716,771 , they say : " But it is not , as an invention , itself the subject of any distinct claim to protection in the latter patent . In our judgment , the language of ...
Contents
1 | iii |
DEFENDANTS IN ACTIONS | vi |
TABLE OF STATUTES AND STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS | xvii |
3 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted alleged allowed ampicillin Appeal Tribunal Whitford applicants for revocation Application 1971 carbon black Ch.D champagne Chancery Division closure complete specification Comptroller computed Mooney concerned considered counsel court defendants described DESIGN AND TRADE disclosed document evidence fact fibres filed Firestone Tyre further Graham grant ground H. P. Bulmer hearing officer heating high Mooney Hoffmann-La Roche infringement inventive step judgment letters patent licence Lionel Heald Lloyd-Jacob Lord manufacture mastication material matter method Mooney rubber nozzle nylon objection opponents opposition proceedings paragraph particular Patent Office Patents Act Patents Appeal Tribunal plaintiffs plasticizer polymer polymerization product present prior art prior claiming prior publication prior user proposed question quinazoline referred regard relating relevant REPORTS OF PATENT result rhombic drive Rubber Company Limited rubber compound sought stitches superintending examiner synthetic rubber tion Tire & Rubber TRADE MARK tread trihydrate United Kingdom validity words yarn Zambon