Reports of Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Cases, Volume 88Published at the Patent Office Sales Branch, 1971 - Design protection |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 49
Page 373
... period of 28 days for the opponents to put in such evidence as they 30 may desire to put in on the further hearing on the question of admissibility of the amendment and validity of the claim , as amended , and a period of six weeks ...
... period of 28 days for the opponents to put in such evidence as they 30 may desire to put in on the further hearing on the question of admissibility of the amendment and validity of the claim , as amended , and a period of six weeks ...
Page 377
... period that , although the amendment allowed was to 8 years , one can really say that this was on the basis that only a little more than that applied for was going to be allowed . In effect the amendment was merely from 3 years to 3 ...
... period that , although the amendment allowed was to 8 years , one can really say that this was on the basis that only a little more than that applied for was going to be allowed . In effect the amendment was merely from 3 years to 3 ...
Page 380
... period for which he seeks extension , and in this case , as I have indicated , the period specified by the patentees was a period of three years . Rule 71 of the Rules requires the Comptroller to advertise the application in 25 The ...
... period for which he seeks extension , and in this case , as I have indicated , the period specified by the patentees was a period of three years . Rule 71 of the Rules requires the Comptroller to advertise the application in 25 The ...
Contents
1 | iii |
DEFENDANTS IN ACTIONS | vi |
TABLE OF STATUTES AND STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS | xvii |
3 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted alleged allowed ampicillin Appeal Tribunal Whitford applicants for revocation Application 1971 carbon black Ch.D champagne Chancery Division closure complete specification Comptroller computed Mooney concerned considered counsel court defendants described DESIGN AND TRADE disclosed document evidence fact fibres filed Firestone Tyre further Graham grant ground H. P. Bulmer hearing officer heating high Mooney Hoffmann-La Roche infringement inventive step judgment letters patent licence Lionel Heald Lloyd-Jacob Lord manufacture mastication material matter method Mooney rubber nozzle nylon objection opponents opposition proceedings paragraph particular Patent Office Patents Act Patents Appeal Tribunal plaintiffs plasticizer polymer polymerization product present prior art prior claiming prior publication prior user proposed question quinazoline referred regard relating relevant REPORTS OF PATENT result rhombic drive Rubber Company Limited rubber compound sought stitches superintending examiner synthetic rubber tion Tire & Rubber TRADE MARK tread trihydrate United Kingdom validity words yarn Zambon