 | Law - 1917 - 510 pages
...government itself and that of the states. It would not be contend"'1 **"* exceptions, it is not percei\red that there is any limit to the questions which can be adjusted touching any matter which is proper!}' the subject of negotiation with a foreign country." These statements of Prof. Story and Justice... | |
 | Ohio State Bar Association - Bar associations - 1919 - 250 pages
...authorize what the constitution forbids, or a change in the nature of the government, or in that of one of the states, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Ry. vs. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that... | |
 | Law - 1920 - 1086 pages
...authorixe what the constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the Government or in that of one of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter (that is, of the State) without its consent. But with these exceptions it is not perceived that there... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1890 - 1130 pages
...authorize what the constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the government, or in that of one of the states, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter, without Ite consent. Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 U. S. 525, 541, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 995. But, with these exceptions,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1890 - 778 pages
...territory of the latter, without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived that...matter which is properly the . -subject of negotiation Avith a foreign country. Ware v. I/ylton, 3 Ball. 199 ; Chirac v. Chirac, 2 Wheat. 259; ffauenstein... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - Courts - 1890 - 784 pages
...authorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the government or in that of one of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter, without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - Courts - 1890 - 788 pages
...authorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the government or in that of one of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter, without its consent. fort Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived... | |
 | James Bradley Thayer - Constitutional law - 1894 - 470 pages
...anthorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the government or in that of one of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter, without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 5tl. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived... | |
 | United States. Department of Justice - Attorneys general's opinions - 1900 - 792 pages
...authorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the Government or in that of one of the States, or a cession of any portion of the...exceptions it is not perceived that there is any limit to it touching any matter which is properly the subject of negotiations with a foreign country." My conclusion... | |
 | Emlin McClain - Constitutional law - 1900 - 1126 pages
...authorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the government or in that of one of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter without its consent. Fort Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, 114 US 525, 541. But with these exceptions, it is not perceived... | |
| |
It would not be contended that it extends so far as to authorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the government or in that of one of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter, without its consent. 
