The Federal Reporter, Volume 138West Publishing Company, 1905 - Law reports, digests, etc Includes cases argued and determined in the District Courts of the United States and, Mar./May 1880-Oct./Nov. 1912, the Circuit Courts of the United States; Sept./Dec. 1891-Sept./Nov. 1924, the Circuit Courts of Appeals of the United States; Aug./Oct. 1911-Jan./Feb. 1914, the Commerce Court of the United States; Sept./Oct. 1919-Sept./Nov. 1924, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
... equity , or other appropriate legal or equitable proceeding on be- half of the said estate against said Sinnott to settle and determine the said questions and compel an accounting between said surviving members of said firm and the ...
... equity , or other appropriate legal or equitable proceeding on be- half of the said estate against said Sinnott to settle and determine the said questions and compel an accounting between said surviving members of said firm and the ...
Page 4
... equity . It has jurisdiction of the assets belonging to the estate of Andrew M. Moore , and all parties in interest , including Sinnott , the surviving partner of the firm of Moore & Sinnott , are before it . The case is within its ...
... equity . It has jurisdiction of the assets belonging to the estate of Andrew M. Moore , and all parties in interest , including Sinnott , the surviving partner of the firm of Moore & Sinnott , are before it . The case is within its ...
Page 28
... equity case . The errors assigned relate to rulings made during the course of the trial before the jury . It is settled by the decision of the Supreme Court in Elliott v . Toeppner , 187 U. S. 327 , 334 , 23 Sup . Ct . 133 , 47 L. Ed ...
... equity case . The errors assigned relate to rulings made during the course of the trial before the jury . It is settled by the decision of the Supreme Court in Elliott v . Toeppner , 187 U. S. 327 , 334 , 23 Sup . Ct . 133 , 47 L. Ed ...
Page 69
... Equity . Suit for infringement of patent . Joseph F. Farmer ( George E. Morse , Clifford E. Dunn , and Henry M. Turk , of counsel ) , for complainant . Field & Chittenden ( Thomas Ewing , Jr. , of counsel ) , for defend- ant . THOMAS ...
... Equity . Suit for infringement of patent . Joseph F. Farmer ( George E. Morse , Clifford E. Dunn , and Henry M. Turk , of counsel ) , for complainant . Field & Chittenden ( Thomas Ewing , Jr. , of counsel ) , for defend- ant . THOMAS ...
Page 82
... Equity . Suit for infringement of letters patent No. 773,234 , for a vibratile apparatus , granted to Lambert Snyder October 25 , 1904. On motion for preliminary injunction . Wm . R. Davis , for the motion . Grafton L. McGill , opposed ...
... Equity . Suit for infringement of letters patent No. 773,234 , for a vibratile apparatus , granted to Lambert Snyder October 25 , 1904. On motion for preliminary injunction . Wm . R. Davis , for the motion . Grafton L. McGill , opposed ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action alleged amendment amount appellee application Asbury Park assessment bankrupt bankruptcy Belmar bill bonds cars cause Cent chamotte Charles Sprague chattel mortgage Circuit Court Circuit Judge claim complainant Constitution contract corporation counsel Court of Appeals court of equity creditors damages decree deed defendant company defendant in error defendant's device District Judge Easton Companies entitled equity evidence fact feet filed held Hertz indorsement infringement interest invention issued judgment jurisdiction jury land lease letters patent libellant lien machine matter ment mortgage neck portion officers oleomargarine operation opinion owner paid parties patent in suit payment person petition plaintiff in error prior art proceedings purchaser purpose question quitclaim deed railroad company reason received River Glass schooner secure statute taxes testimony thereof tion U. S. Comp United valid vessel void
Popular passages
Page 703 - that the laws of the several States, except where the Constitution, treaties, or statutes of the United States shall otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply.
Page 436 - ... although the death shall have been caused under such circumstances as amount in law to felony.
Page 506 - ... if the interest of the insured be other than unconditional and sole ownership; or if the subject of insurance be a building on ground, not owned by the insured in fee simple...
Page 68 - President, to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him; for what?
Page 178 - States governing their possessory title, shall have the exclusive right of possession and enjoyment of all the surface included within the lines of their locations, and of all veins, lodes and ledges throughout their entire depth, the top or apex of which lies inside of such surface lines extended downward vertically, although such veins, lodes, or ledges may so far depart from a perpendicular in their course downward as to extend outside the vertical side lines of such surface locations.
Page 496 - This policy is made and accepted subject to the foregoing stipulations and conditions, together with such other provisions, agreements, or conditions as may be endorsed hereon or added hereto, and no officer, agent, or other representative of this company shall have power to waive any provision or condition of this policy except such as by the terms of this policy may be the subject of agreement indorsed hereon or added hereto...
Page 436 - That every such action shall be brought by and in the names of the personal representatives of such deceased person, and the amount recovered in every such action shall be for the exclusive benefit of the widow and next of kin of such deceased person...
Page 261 - No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title...
Page 436 - ... every such action shall be for the exclusive benefit of the widow and next of kin of such deceased person, and shall be distributed to such widow and next of kin in the proportion provided by law in relation to the distribution of personal property left by persons dying intestate...
Page 114 - The very object of these laws is monopoly, and the rule is, with few exceptions, that any conditions which are not in their very nature illegal with regard to this kind of property, imposed by the patentee and agreed to by the licensee for the right to manufacture or use or sell the article, will be upheld by the courts. The fact that the conditions in the contracts keep up the monopoly or fix prices does not render them illegal.