Page images
PDF
EPUB

terrified cattle. Where that road divides into two branches, one leading to Avesnes and the other to Philippeville, the fugitives separated themselves, no one pretending to give any general direction, and followed either route as chance or choice directed each individual, or group of flyers. Notwithstanding Buonaparte's orders, no attempt was made to assemble any force at Avesnes: Soult contrived at Mezieres to collect about four thousand stragglers, destitute of cannon, baggage, and arms, with whom he withdrew under the walls of Laon. There they were joined by other stragglers, and at length by the corps of Grouchy and Vandamme.

This division of the French army had fought the battle of Wavres, it will be remembered, on the 18th; and, upon receiving the news of that of Waterloo, was the following day under the necessity of commencing a perilous retreat in front of the Prussian corps with whom they had been engaged, and which had formerly retired before them, but now instantly resumed the offensive. The attack of Thielman, which took place so soon as the French columns began to retreat, was made with such fury, that great slaughter ensued; Vandamme himself was wounded, several guns were taken, and the French division, with difficulty and loss, fell back upon Namur. Here Grouchy resumed his retreat, committing to Vandamme, with the rear-guard, the difficult task of protecting it. The French lined the decayed and imperfect and ruined defences of that once strong town, and defended them with success against the van-guard of the pursuers. But when the main body of the Prussians came up, scaling ladders were applied, the place carried by storm, the defenders driven through the streets, and pursued with great loss along the difficult and narrow defiles which the

high-road passes as it leads from Namur to Dinant. Here they lost many men and cannon. But by dint of sacrificing the rear, the French generals were enabled to conduct to Rocroi, and from thence to Laon, about twenty thousand men, in much more tolerable plight as to arms, arrangement, and military equipment, than those whom Soult had rallied in that neighbourhood. And although Grouchy's. retreat cost greatly more than onethird of his troops, yet, in the circumstances in which he was placed, it was by no common exertions of generalship that he prevented the same total dissolution of his army which had befallen that of Napoleon. The Avenger of Blood was in the mean time pressing on their footsteps.

Blucher, on the second day after the battle, was under the walls of Avesnes, which he carried by escalade, taking five and forty pieces of cannon. To give the French a feeling of those severities which they had often inflicted on the German and Spanish prisoners of war, he directed that the captive garrison of Avesnes should be employed to work on the fortifications of Cologne, and the officers confined in the citadel of Wessep; " all," as the Prince-Marshal's dispatch sternly expresses it, "to be treated with the necessary severity." It had been agreed between Wellington and Blucher, that, without paying attention to the strang barrier towns of Lisle and Valenciennes, &c. but leaving them to be masked by the other troops of the coalition as they came up, the victorious armies of Britain and Prússia should, with the least possible delay, march forward on Paris. After the capture of Avesnes, therefore, the Prince-Marshal continued his march upon Laon, and occupied St Quentin in his route. The same severity which dictated the order from Avesnes regu

lated the Prussian conduct on their march. Blucher acted on the avowed principle, that France should feel the effects of war as a future lesson, and, it must be owned, his soldiers willingly seconded the views of their chief. Nothing could be more strongly contrasted than the two parallel lines on which the Prussians and British marched to Paris; and the stern vengeance of the Prince Marshal will long remain recorded upon the former, in characters of ruin and desolation.

The British general kept the more northern road to Paris, and, owing to the necessity of halting two days after the severe action of Waterloo, only entered the French territories upon the 20th of June. An order, made public at Binche on that day, apprized the soldiers that they were about to enter the territory of an ally of the respective sovereigns of the union, and commanding, therefore, the most strict observance of discipline. This order was so punctually obeyed, that the march of the British troops through France was acknowledged, by the inhabitants themselves, to have been conducted with infinitely more attention to public and private property, than had ever marked the conduct of their own troops on similar occasions. The consequence was, that the British were hailed in every town where they arrived as friends and protectors, rather than regarded as an invading army. The country through which they marched was favourable to the Bourbon cause, and readily and spontaneously raised the white flag, and assumed the emblems of returning loyalty. Cambrai, a town well fortified, and strongly situated in a marshy and flat country, was summoned by a detachment from the right of Lord Wellington's army. It was garrisoned chiefly by national guards, who showing some symptoms of indecision, Gen.

June 24.

Colville, who commanded the British forces, hazarded an attack by esca-lade, made at four different points. The coup-de-main perfectly succeeded, in some degree with the aid of the citizens of the place, who were zealous royalists. The citadel surrendered in the course of the next day. The King of France soon after entered this town, and was received with great rejoicing. Peronne, a place so strong that it is said never to have been taken, (and was therefore hitherto termed Peronne la Pucelle,) fell next in their line of operation. Garrisoned like Cambrai with national guards, who had no good-will to the quarrel in which they had been engaged, this town, so capable of defence, surrendered to June 26. General Maitland, after a horn-work, which covers the suburb on the left of the Somme, had been carried by storm. The garrison, like that of Cambrai, laid down their arms, and was permitted to retire to their own habitations.

While the British thus advanced with little opposition, the course of Blucher, who, owing to the delay occasioned by the capture of these two towns, had gained a day's march in: advance, was not so bloodless. His army occupied a line from Senlis through Villers Coterets to La Ferté Milon. This position interposed the whole Prussian army between Paris and the body of French troops assembled under Soult and Grouchy at Laon, which had now advanced as far as Soissons toward the capital. The situation of the latter became extremely critical, and they were compelled to hazard a desperate attack on the Prussian centre at Villers Coterets, hoping to break through Blucher's position, and so force their way to Paris. The attack miscarried, with the loss of six guns and a thousand prisoners; but the French generals,

nevertheless, found means, by a rapid movement to their right, to attempt a second attack on the left wing of the Prince-Marshal. Here they also sustained some loss; but nevertheless, by the skill and rapidity of their movements, avoided the attempts made to cut them off, and, crossing the Marne, gained the road to Paris through Meaux; and contrary, perhaps, to their own expectations, as well as those of their enemies, carried their forces unbroken under the walls of the capital.

The provisional government rejoiced in the arrival of these troops, chiefly as they gave them a colour of strength to give weight to the negociation which they had already commenced. Their commissioners and plenipotentiaries, La Fayette, Pontecoulant, with three others, with the versatile Constant for their secretary, had been dispatched to the head-quarters of the allies, with letters to Blucher and Wellington, soliciting an armistice, and declaring that France had removed the only alleged cause of the war, in receiving the abdication of Buonaparte. They were the bearers of letters from the provisional government to the Prussian and Eng. lish generals. And at the same time, or soon after, letters were sent from Fouché and Davoust to the allied generals, requesting an armistice. The Duke of Wellington returned a civil refusal. Blucher's language was more harsh. Paris and France," he said, "were at his mercy-he came to help the honest men against the knaves, and he warned Davoust not to treat Paris as he had done Hamburgh," This was bitter language; but Nelson, who knew the French character well, was of opinion, that when dealt with according to the punctilious decorum of ceremonious intercourse, they are apt to set down the courtesies which they receive as marks of timidity in

those who use them. The commissioners were sent forward to Haguenau, where the allied sovereigns, advancing at the head of a large army, held their head-quarters for the present. They had here a conference with plenipotentiaries on the part of the allies.

That the name of Napoleon II. might be no objection to the treaty, the powers of the commissioners to treat were stated to be in the name, and for the benefit, of the French people. Their ostensible pleas, as already noticed, were founded upon the allegation, that Buonaparte's elevation having been the declared cause of the allies having taken up arms, the sole occasion of the war was removed by his abdication. They urged, that the allied powers had declared, that it was no part of their intention to force a government on the French nation, and that the Prince Regent, in particular, had declared, that, in acceding to the treaty of Vienna, he did not bind the British government to insist upon the restoration of the Bourbon family as an indispensable condition of peace. The plain answer to this plea was, that the clause in the treaty founded upon was so far from barring the Prince Regent from giving assistance to his dethroned ally, Louis XVIII.; that, on the contrary, it was qualified with the most express acknowledgment of his rights, and of the intention of Great Britain to support them so far as the events of war would enable her to do, although the Prince Regent, wisely distrustful of futurity, declined to pledge the nation to a prosecution of the war on that sole ground. In a word, so far from renouncing the restoration of the Bourbons at the outset of the contest, it was pronounced a main object of the war, to be pursued with all such energy as was consistent in the first place with prudence, and the regard

due to their own states, in case reverses should render it of difficult attainment; and, in the second place, subject, as the prosecution of every such object must be, to the laws of international justice respecting France. The battle of Waterloo, and its conquences, decided the first question, and gave the allies the full power of restoring the king. The fundamental question remained behind, how far it could be justly exercised, or was to be considered as an act of tyranny and oppression to the realm of France. The solution of this question must clearly depend upon the character of the present government towards Europe, and towards France.

The first was the more important subject of consideration to the sovereigns, who had taken up arms to compel France, from whom they had sustained for twenty years so many acts of aggression, willing or not willing, to adopt such a mode of government as would afford reasonable guarantees for the peace of Europe. This was the ground on which they attacked Buonaparte, and it is plain that this provisional government, composed of and supported by the very men who had been active in his cause, and selected by him as a ministry, had the same character of usurpation and violence which attached to his own. If the principles which they held out were of a more popular character, it was impossible for the allied sovereigns to forget that these were the very principles which had before been perverted to so much mischief, and professed in many instances by the very men who had carried on a revolutionary war in Europe before Buonaparte rose to distinction, for the express purpose of altering every other government to the model of the republic, one and indivisible. To have left these men in possession of power, would have indeed been to have thrown away the fruits of a victory, bought by so many in

On

valuable lives, and the sovereigns would have acted as foolishly as he who, desirous to root up a poison-tree, should only lop its topmost bough, and spare its stem and its roots. the principle of self-preservation, therefore, they were entitled, and called upon, to tear up from the roots a government capable of renewing the mischiefs to which it had formerly given rise, and conducted, too, by the very same men, under whose direction it had achieved all the evils of which its re-establishment threatened the renewal. And this they were entitled to do by the means of a just, because a necessary war, although every man in France had distinctly given his assent to this government, and was now willing to adhere to and maintain it. The principle would resolve into that by which war was declared against Buonaparte, namely, that every state's right to chuse its own government must be necessarily qualified by the condition, that the government so chosen shall be consistent with the safety and quiet of their neighbours. In justice, therefore, to the cause in which they had drawn their swords, the allies were compelled to refuse the terms of peace proposed by a government, who, no more than Buonaparte himself, could offer any guarantee for the tranquillity of Europe.

But we shall suppose the safety of Europe out of question, and that the war had been only undertaken with the purpose of supporting an unfortunate ally driven from his throne, which has been in all ages a common reason assigned for hostilities. It is clear that such a war must be just or unjust, according to the circumstances attending the expulsion of the prince whose cause is espoused. If he has lawfully forfeited his throne, the powerful ally who replaces him in his authority abuses the superior force which he possesses, and commits a gross crime against the national independence of the injured

there, even before the appearance of

the allies.

In the departments, the cause of Louis XVIII. was every where revi ving. The whole north of France was fast declaring for the king, and Picardy was already levying troops in his behalf. Marseilles, and a considerable part of the south of France, hoist

of Waterloo, excepting Toulon, which was overawed by its garrison. The dispositions of Bourdeaux, Tholouse, and the countries of La Vendee and of Britainy, were well known, and, in short, nothing, excepting terror of the army and the federates, prevented a declaration in favour of Louis as universal as that which preceded his first restoration. Wherever he went, subjects crowded around him with congratulations and rejoicings, and made manifest what we have already said, that the inclination of the people was strongly in favour of his person, although they had been unable to oppose effectual resistance to the more violent and energetic partizans of Buonaparte.

people, whom he again subjects to the power of a tyrant. Nay, if a case could be imagined in which a people, exercising their own right of freeagency as a state, should, for no other reason than because such was their pleasure, achieve a change of dynasty, we acknowledge no right in their neighbours to interfere in behalf of that which is set aside. But if a na-ed the white flag on news of the battle tion is divided into parties, one of which is headed by the dethroned prince, an ally of the power whose assistance we invoke,-if he in his just cause is likely to be borne down by the superior force of his enemy, at all times, and in all countries, it has been held the bounden duty of his confederates to afford him such assistance to assert his lawful rights as they can do without prejudice to their own subjects; and this has been the universal practice of Europe. Now, what proofs could the provisional government produce of representing the French nation, in whose name they pretended to treat? They could only refer to the momentary possession of the power which the abdication of Buonaparte had unexpectedly thrown into their hands. The self-chosen substitutes of an usurper, they could not even appeal to the poor farce of the Champ de Mai as a testimony of the adhesion of the French people. They dared not even attempt to command the few soldiers who remained to them, or the mob of the suburbs, in their own name, but had been compelled, greatly against their inclination, to use the name of Napoleon II., although in the conferences they affected to disown him. They had not, excepting in the vicinity of Paris, any personal partizans, and in the capital it was well known that the royalists greatly predominated. It is, indeed, probable, that nothing but the presence of the army prevented a complete counter-revolution taking place

How, therefore, and in what respect, were the provisional government in the right of representing the people of France, entering into terms for that great kingdom, and stipulating the conditions on which her government was to rest in future? If they had the right of representing any party at all, it was only those who adhered to the dynasty of Buonaparte, which they found it necessary to disown, as a preliminary to any ne-, gociation whatever. The only effec tual adherents whom they boasted, were the army and federates, who had plainly shown they only submitted to the present authority as representing Napoleon II. So that if the sovereigns had gone into the views held out by the commissioners, of setting aside Louis and the Bourbons, on the

« PreviousContinue »