Senate Debate on the Panama Canal Treaties: A Compendium of Major Statements, Documents, Record Votes, and Relevant Events |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 178
If Panama should not concur in our action , or if Panama actively opposed it , there is no question in my mind that Panama would interpret such action as directed against her territorial integrity and her political independence .
If Panama should not concur in our action , or if Panama actively opposed it , there is no question in my mind that Panama would interpret such action as directed against her territorial integrity and her political independence .
Page 270
The report notes that the power to appropriate money or to impose taxes cannot be exercised by treaty because the Constitution specifically limits their exercise to action by both Houses . The Senator then argues that since the ...
The report notes that the power to appropriate money or to impose taxes cannot be exercised by treaty because the Constitution specifically limits their exercise to action by both Houses . The Senator then argues that since the ...
Page 407
Provided that the agreement in Article IV to maintain the regime of neutrality would permit either Panama or the United States to take unilateral action to defend the Canal against any threat which it determined to warrant such action .
Provided that the agreement in Article IV to maintain the regime of neutrality would permit either Panama or the United States to take unilateral action to defend the Canal against any threat which it determined to warrant such action .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
REPRESENTATIVE STATEMENTS ON THE MAJOR THEMES | 17 |
Laxalt March 1 1978 | 218 |
SUMMARY TEXT AND VOTE FOR ALL PROPOSED AMEND | 343 |
Copyright | |
2 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accordance action agreed agreement Allen amendment America approval Article authority believe build Byrd Canal Zone Chiefs colleague Commission Committee Company concerned Congress Congressional Record considered Constitution construction continued costs debate decision defense Department distinguished economic effect fact figures force Foreign Relations future give going Government granted GRAVEL House important increase interest issue land LAXALT leader legislation major March matter means ment military million necessary negotiate officers operation Panama Canal Treaty Panamanian Parties payment percent period position possible present President proposed protect question ratification reason Relations Representatives Republic of Panama reservation respect responsibility result ROBERT Senator ships signed statement talking territory tion toll Torrijos transfer transit understand United vessels vote yield