United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volume 248United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1919 - Courts |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 30
Page 24
... Dismissed for want of jurisdiction . LAY ET AL . v . LAY ET AL . ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MIS- SISSIPPI . No. 633. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted November 4 , 1918.- Decided November 18 , 1918 . As between the ...
... Dismissed for want of jurisdiction . LAY ET AL . v . LAY ET AL . ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MIS- SISSIPPI . No. 633. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted November 4 , 1918.- Decided November 18 , 1918 . As between the ...
Page 34
... denied and this court , sua sponte , dis- misses the writ of error for want of jurisdiction . Dismissed . Opinion of the Court . ORR v . ALLEN ET 34 OCTOBER TERM , 1918 .
... denied and this court , sua sponte , dis- misses the writ of error for want of jurisdiction . Dismissed . Opinion of the Court . ORR v . ALLEN ET 34 OCTOBER TERM , 1918 .
Page 131
... dismissed the suit for want of jurisdiction . Judgment reversed and case remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss it for want of jurisdiction . ( MR . JUSTICE MCREYNOLDS took no part in the consid- eration and decision ...
... dismissed the suit for want of jurisdiction . Judgment reversed and case remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss it for want of jurisdiction . ( MR . JUSTICE MCREYNOLDS took no part in the consid- eration and decision ...
Page 272
... dismissed for want of jurisdiction . ANDREWS , ADMINISTRATRIX OF ANDREWS , v . VIRGINIAN RAILWAY COMPANY . ERROR TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT , STATE OF VIRGINIA . No. 82. Argued December 16 , 17 , 1918. - Decided January 7 ...
... dismissed for want of jurisdiction . ANDREWS , ADMINISTRATRIX OF ANDREWS , v . VIRGINIAN RAILWAY COMPANY . ERROR TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT , STATE OF VIRGINIA . No. 82. Argued December 16 , 17 , 1918. - Decided January 7 ...
Page 276
... Dismissed for want of jurisdiction . MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v . STATE OF KANSAS . ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS . No. 14. Submitted November 13 , 1918. - Decided January 7 , 1919 . The provision of the ...
... Dismissed for want of jurisdiction . MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v . STATE OF KANSAS . ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS . No. 14. Submitted November 13 , 1918. - Decided January 7 , 1919 . The provision of the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed alleged Amendment apply Argument Associated Press Attorney authority bill of lading BRANDEIS brief California carrier Chicago Circuit Court Circuit denied City claim clause Congress Constitution construction contract corporation County Court of Appeals Creek Curiam December December 16 December 9 Decisions on Petitions decree defendant in error defendant's delivered the opinion dissenting District Court entitled fact federal foreign vessels freight Government grant held interest interstate commerce January judgment JUSTICE Kansas land legislation libel ment Minnesota Missouri National Bank November November 18 October 28 Ohio owner Pacific parties patent payment person petitioner Petitions for Writs plaintiff in error purpose question RAILROAD COMPANY RAILWAY COMPANY respondent rule Saxlehner seamen sewer ship shipment shipper Stat statute suit supra Supreme Court tion Trustee United want of jurisdiction Western Union writ of certiorari writ of error York
Popular passages
Page 52 - Any person who shall be injured in his business or property by any other person or corporation by reason of anything forbidden or declared to be unlawful by this act, may sue therefor in any circuit court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the costs of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee.
Page 140 - Any carrier or party liable on account of loss of or damage to any of said property shall have the full benefit of any insurance that may have been effected upon or on account of said property, so far as this shall not avoid the policies or contracts of insurance: Provided, That the carrier reimburse the claimant for the premium paid thereon.
Page 194 - That it shall be, and is hereby made, unlawful in any case to pay any seaman wages in advance of the time when he has actually earned the same, or to pay such advance wages, or to make any order, or note, or other evidence of indebtedness...
Page 306 - The following contracts are invalid, unless the same, or some note or memorandum thereof, is in writing and subscribed by the party to be charged or by his agent: 1. An agreement that by its terms is not to be performed within a year from the making thereof; 2.
Page 197 - The jurisdiction of the nation within its own territory is necessarily exclusive and absolute. It is susceptible of no limitation not imposed by itself. Any restriction upon it, deriving validity from an external source, would imply a diminution of its sovereignty to the extent of the restriction, and an investment of that sovereignty to the same extent in that power which could impose such restriction.
Page 404 - And all such lands, so granted by this section, which shall not be sold or disposed of by said company within three years after the entire road shall have been completed, shall be subject to settlement and pre-emption, like other lands, at a price not exceeding one dollar and twenty-five cents per acre, to be paid to said company.
Page 203 - But the general and almost universal rule is that the character of an act as lawful or unlawful must be determined wholly by the law of the country where the act is done...
Page 344 - Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises...
Page 415 - Whoever shall order, purchase, or cause intoxicating liquors to be transported in interstate commerce, except for scientific, sacramental, medicinal, and mechanical purposes, into any State or Territory the laws of which State or Territory prohibit the manufacture or sale therein of intoxicating liquors for beverage purposes...
Page 91 - There is no such thing as property in a trade-mark except as a right appurtenant to an established business or trade in connection with which the mark is employed. The law of trade-marks is but a part of the broader law of unfair competition...