American Electrical Cases (cited Am Electl. Cas.): Being a Collection of All the Important Cases (excepting Patent Cases) Decided in the State and Federal Courts of the United States from 1873 [to 1908] on Subjects Relating to the Telegraph, the Telephone, Electric Light and Power, Electric Railway, and All Other Practical Uses of Electricity, with Annotations, Volume 8

Front Cover
William Weeks Morrill
M. Bender, 1904 - Electric utilities

From inside the book

Contents

Baxter Springs City of v Baxter Springs Light Power Co 125
597
Cumberland Telegraph Telephone Co v Hunt 498
604
Spraul 770 771
607
Aurora Elect L P Co 220
611
Injuries to employes by contact with live wires
635
Shannon
639
Dallas Electric Co v Mitchell 692
648
New Omaha ThomsonHouston Electri Light Co v Rombold
654
Western Union Telegraph Co 730
669
Kern
676
Maupin
683
Missouri Edison Electric Co 569
708
Tatum
719
Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Co
724
Commissioners
736
Railway Co
738
Bordentown Electric Light Motor Co et al Hamilton v 524
743
Conrads Admr
748
Defective pole and crossarms
749
Michigan Tel Co v City
753
Newport City of Postal Telegraph Cable Co v 25
762
Ohio Postal Telegraph Cable Co et al Cleveland C C St L Ry Co v 252
777
Portland General Electric Co 476
792
Contact with electric wires of another company
795
St Louis City of v Howard 145
796
Des Moines Edison Light Co Knowlton v
800
Light Co 581
804
GiletteHerzog Mfg Co Klages v
818
RIGHTS OF PATRONS OF TELEPHONE TELEGRAPH AND ELETRIC
845
Haber Blum Bloch Hat Co v Southern Bell Telephone Telegraph Co
847
Gas Co v State ex rel Ball
859
Hall et al Muskogee Nat Telephone Co v 64
860
684
863
Railway Co 180 193
867
Gaslight Co v Hildebrand
883
474
894
181
910
113
911
MISCELLANEOUS
915
Missouri Edison Electric Co Geismann v 569
923
Gaslight Coke Co v Vestry
932
Paterson Passaic Gas Elect Co v State Board of Assessors 403
938
Parmly
939
Dist Printing Teleg Co Maxwell v 206
947
Duluth City of v Duluth Teleph Co 136
957
Missouri Kansas Telephone Co Roberts v 767
960
Branford Lighting Water Co Nelson v 542
967
Pennsylvania R R v Lilly Borough 265
973
296
976
Brush Elect Light Co Commonwealth v 405
977
East Tennessee Telephone Co City of Morristown v 3
978
Jackson Suburban Street Railroad Co v Simmons 834
989
Porter Atlanta Standard Tel Co v 848
992
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 190 - Municipal and other corporations and Individuals invested with the privilege of taking private property for public use shall make just compensation for property taken, injured or destroyed by the construction or enlargement of their works, highways or improvements, which compensation shall be paid or secured before such taking, injury or destruction.
Page 181 - Private property shall not be taken or damaged for public use without just compensation having been first made to, or paid into Court for, the owner...
Page 314 - It shall be the duty of the Legislature to provide for the organization of cities and incorporated villages, and to restrict their power of taxation, assessment, borrowing money, contracting debts, and loaning their credit, so as to prevent abuses in assessments, and in contracting debt by such municipal corporations.
Page 501 - After the verdict the defendant filed a motion for a new trial because the verdict was against the evidence and the weight of the evidence and because the damages were excessive.
Page 485 - The proximate cause of an event must be understood to be that which in a natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any new, independent cause, produces that event, and without which that event would not have occurred.
Page 261 - Before property can, be taken, it must appear: 1. That the use to which it is to be applied is a use authorized by law; 2. That the taking is necessary to such use; 3. If already appropriated to some public use, that the public use to which it is to be applied is a more necessary public use...
Page 721 - Misconduct of the jury; and whenever any one or more of the jurors have been induced to assent to any general or special verdict, or to a finding on any question submitted to them by the court, by a resort to the determination of chance, such misconduct may be proved by the affidavit of any one of the jurors ; 3.
Page 45 - The judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded for such further proceedings as may be consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered.
Page 273 - Union, shall have the right to construct, maintain, and operate lines of telegraph through and over any portion of the public domain of the United States, over and along any of the military or post roads of the United States...
Page 714 - The burden of proof is on the plaintiff to show by a preponderance of the testimony that the defendants, or one of them, was guilty of negligence which resulted directly in the death of the deceased.

Bibliographic information