A TABLE

OF

CASES REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME.

Abbot's ex'r v. Doe ex dem Ken-
nedy,

Adams v. Tanner & Horton,
Alston and Ravisies,

Alexander's adm'r v. The Bank at

Montgomery,
Alexander v. Alexander,
Armstrong and Thompson,
Auze's heirs and Batre,

393 Brantley and Rice,

297 Brinyea and The State,
Brown and Betts,

465 Brown v. Brown,

383 Brodnax & Newton and Stephens,

173 Burt and Wright, et als,

Bank of the State and Bondurant,
Bank of the State and Young,
Bank of the State v. Crawford,
Bank, Br of, at Mobile and Smith,
Bank at Mobile and Snelgrove,
Bank at Mobile v. Murphey's adm'rs,
Bank at Montgomery v- Crocheron, 250 Carter v. Castleberry,
Bank at Montgomery and Alexan-

Bolling and Evans,

550

184

740 Brazeal v. Smith,

206

241

414

508

517 Branham and Wilkinson,

608

258

29

171 Burns v. The State,

227

179 Butler and Alford v. O'Brien,

316

679 Campbell & Cleveland and Quigley, 76 26 Caperton v. Martin,

217

295 Cahawba and Marion R. R. Co. and

237

277

Bass and Carter v. Gilliland's heirs, 761 Conklin v. Harris,

213

Doe ex dem Kennedy v. Abbott's ex'r,333 ndrix and Saunders,

Minge and Russell v. Curry and Co. 168 Schieffelin & Co. and Kemper &

Pool v. The Cahawba and M.R.R.Co.237 Steele and Robinson & wife,

578 Stuart and Pruitt, et al.

McQueen,592 Sturdevant v. Gaines,
112 Sumwalt and Thrash,
446 Sweeney and O'Donnell,
76 Taylor v. Bass,

REPORTS

OF

CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED,

JANUARY TERM, 1843.

THE BRANCH BANK AT DECATUR v. KINSEY.

1. A bill of exceptions allowed and scaled by the Court, becomes a part of the record, and cannot be altered or amended by the Judge after the adjournment of the Court.

2. In a contest between a creditor and one claiming by deed from the debtor, the consideration is not proved by the recital in the deed, but must be shown by extrinsic evidence.

ERROR to the Circuit Court of Lawrence.

Original attachment v. Joshua T. Kinsey, by the plaintiff in error, which was levied on certain slaves. To the property thus levied on, John M. Kinsey set up a claim, by affidavit, under the statute, and gave bond to try the right of property; and the cause coming on to be tried, a verdict and judgment was rendered for the claimant.

Pending the trial, a bill of exceptions was taken, from which it appears, that the Bank proved the slaves in controversy to have been in the possession of the defendant in the attachment, at the time of the levy by the sheriff, and also proved the value of the property.