The American Journal of International Law, Volume 44American Society of International Law, 1950 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 70
Page 43
... tribunal and its judgment is not , of course , similar to that of any national court . It is indeed argued that special circumstances attended the creation and functioning of that tribunal , but this has no relevance to the future . If ...
... tribunal and its judgment is not , of course , similar to that of any national court . It is indeed argued that special circumstances attended the creation and functioning of that tribunal , but this has no relevance to the future . If ...
Page 189
... tribunal . The argument in support of this contention overlooks important facts . . . . If the court was not a tribunal of the United States , its actions cannot be reviewed by any court of this country . . . [ citing Hirota v ...
... tribunal . The argument in support of this contention overlooks important facts . . . . If the court was not a tribunal of the United States , its actions cannot be reviewed by any court of this country . . . [ citing Hirota v ...
Page 686
... Tribunal did adjourn , but only for nine days ( August 16-25 ) , and not for " two weeks , " as stated by Mr. Mallet - Prevost . ( This was only one of the Tribunal's ten adjournments , but as it was the longest , although not by very ...
... Tribunal did adjourn , but only for nine days ( August 16-25 ) , and not for " two weeks , " as stated by Mr. Mallet - Prevost . ( This was only one of the Tribunal's ten adjournments , but as it was the longest , although not by very ...
Contents
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL | 2 |
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL | 3 |
VOL | 55 |
33 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acceptance action adopted agreement Albania alien American application arbitration Article Assembly authority belligerent occupation BFSP Bogotá Brazil Britain British Bulgaria Charter China Chinese Communist citizen claim concerning concluded Conference Constitution consular consuls Convention coöperation countries crimes Czechoslovak debts decision Delegation diplomatic Draft Declaration Droit International duty economic effect enemy established force foreign France French German Government held Hungary Hyderabad Ibid India International Court international criminal court International Law Commission JOURNAL July jurisdiction Justice Kuomintang League of Nations legislation ment military Netherlands obligations opinion Organization Pact Pakistan Peace Treaties persons political Portugal principles procedure provisions question recognition recognized relations representative Republic resolution rules Secretary Security Council Sept Sixth Committee slave trade sovereignty Soviet Union Statute Supp territory Text tion Treaty Series Tribunal U.N. Doc United Kingdom United Nations violation vote