The American Journal of International Law, Volume 44American Society of International Law, 1950 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 76
Page 19
... opinion of the judges , any judge shall be entitled to deliver a separate opinion . and in French : Si l'arrêt n'exprime pas en tout ou en partie l'opinion unanime des juges , tout juge aura le droit d'y joindre l'exposé de son opinion ...
... opinion of the judges , any judge shall be entitled to deliver a separate opinion . and in French : Si l'arrêt n'exprime pas en tout ou en partie l'opinion unanime des juges , tout juge aura le droit d'y joindre l'exposé de son opinion ...
Page 730
... opinion and Judges Winiarski ( Poland ) , Zoričic ( Yugoslavia ) , and Krylov ( Soviet Union ) rendered dissenting opinions . Was the General Assembly's request for an advisory opinion an at- tempt to circumvent the principle that the ...
... opinion and Judges Winiarski ( Poland ) , Zoričic ( Yugoslavia ) , and Krylov ( Soviet Union ) rendered dissenting opinions . Was the General Assembly's request for an advisory opinion an at- tempt to circumvent the principle that the ...
Page 746
... Opinion which has been requested are ill - founded and cannot be upheld . Another argument that has been invoked against the power of the Court to answer the Questions put to it in this case is based on the opposition of the Governments ...
... Opinion which has been requested are ill - founded and cannot be upheld . Another argument that has been invoked against the power of the Court to answer the Questions put to it in this case is based on the opposition of the Governments ...
Contents
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL | 2 |
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL | 3 |
VOL | 55 |
33 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acceptance action adopted agreement Albania alien American application arbitration Article Assembly authority belligerent occupation BFSP Bogotá Brazil Britain British Bulgaria Charter China Chinese Communist citizen claim concerning concluded Conference Constitution consular consuls Convention coöperation countries crimes Czechoslovak debts decision Delegation diplomatic Draft Declaration Droit International duty economic effect enemy established force foreign France French German Government held Hungary Hyderabad Ibid India International Court international criminal court International Law Commission JOURNAL July jurisdiction Justice Kuomintang League of Nations legislation ment military Netherlands obligations opinion Organization Pact Pakistan Peace Treaties persons political Portugal principles procedure provisions question recognition recognized relations representative Republic resolution rules Secretary Security Council Sept Sixth Committee slave trade sovereignty Soviet Union Statute Supp territory Text tion Treaty Series Tribunal U.N. Doc United Kingdom United Nations violation vote