ORR, EWING & Co. v. Johnstone & Co., 40 L. T. (N. S.) 307

Otto v. Linford, 46 L. T. (N. S.) 35.

Oxley v. Holden, 8 C. B. (N. S.) 666

PALMER V. Cooper, 9 Ex. 231

P.

Parkes v. Stevens, L. R. 8 Eq. 358; 5 App. Cas. 36.
Patent Type Founding Company v. Lloyd, 5 H. & N. 192

Pater v. Baker, 3 C. B. 831

v. Rich, Johns 381.

131

xlii, lii, lvi xlviii, li, 23

Patterson v. The Gaslight and Coke Company, 2 Ch. D. 812;

Perkins' Patent, in re, 2 Webs. P. R. 17

Perry v. Truefitt, 6 Beav. 66

Pidding v. Franks, 1 Mac. & G. 56

v. Howe, 8 Sim. 477

Pierce v. Worth, 18 L. T. (N. S.) 710

Piggott v. Anglo-American Telegraph Company, 19 L. T.

(N. S.) 46.

Pitt v. Donovan, 1 M. & S. 639

57

xlvi, lv

73

xlv

78

10

25, 72

72

50, 51

129

83

129

lx

74

78

Plimpton v. Spiller, 6 Ch. D. 412; 4 Ch. D. 286 1, lvi, 18, 55, 68, 161

RABONE Brothers & Co., in re, Seb. Dig. of T. M. 395
Raggett v. Findlater, L. R. 17 Eq. 29; 43 L. J. Ch. 64
Ralph v. Taylor, 25 Ch. D. 194 .

140

130

lxii

Ralston v. Smith, 11 H. L. C. 223

Ransome v. Graham, 51 L. J. Ch. 897

Regina v. Betts, 15 Q. B. 540

Renard v. Levenstein, 2 Hem. & M. 628; 10 L. T. (N. S.) 177

PAGE

xliii, 40

lxi

57

XXX, 63

Rex v. Arkwright, 1 Webs. P. R. 72; Dav. P. C. 61, 106. liii, liv, lv
Riego de la Branchardiere v. Elvery, 18 L. J. Ex. 381
Roberts' Patent, in re, 1 Webs. P. R. 513

Robinson v. Finlay ; Ward v. Robinson, 9 Ch. D. 487; 39 L. T.

104

51

v. Cowley, 1 W. P. 459

v. Ledsam, 14 M. & W. 574; 11 M. & W. 647

SALAMON, in re, Seb. Dig. 340

Sarazin v. Hamel, 9 Jur. (N. S.) 192; 32 L. J. Ch. 380
Saxby's Patent, L. R. 3 P. C. 294
Saxby v. Clunes, 43 L. J. Ex. 228

v. The Gloucester Waggon Co., 7 Q. B. D. 305

Scott & Young, ex parte, L. R. 6 Ch. 274

Sellers v. Dickinson, 5 Ex. 312; 20 L. J. Ex. 417

Shipwright v. Clements, 19 W. R. 599; Seb. Dig. 210
Simpson v. Holliday, L. R. 1 H. L. 315; 35 L. J. Ch. 811; 13

Singer Manufacturing Company v. Wilson, 13 W. R. 563

Sykes v. Howarth, 12 Ch. D. 826; 48 L. J. Ch. 769 .

UNITED Telephone Company v. Harrison Cox-Walker & Co.

WALKDEN Aërated Waters Company, in re, 1 Trade Marks, 39.
Walton v. Lavater, 8 C. B. (N. S.) 162

v. Potter, 1 Webs. P. R. 493

Watson v. Holliday, 46 L. T. (N. S.) 878; 48 L. T. (N. S.)

Wegmann v. Corcoran, 13 Ch. D. 65.

Welch v. Knott, 4 K. & J. 747; 4 Jur. (N. S.) 330

Wellington v. Dale, 7 Ex. 888

Wotherspoon v. Currie, 42 L. J. Ch. 130; L. R. 5 H. L. 508

128

82, 83,

LETTERS PATENT.

II. Designs.

Utility

Specification

III. Trade Marks.

TABLE OF STEPS TO BE TAKEN IN ORDER TO OBTAIN

THE PATENTS, DESIGNS, AND TRADE MARKS ACT, 1883,

WITH EXPLANATORY NOTES AND NOTES OF CASES

ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

PART I. PRELIMINARY

lii

liii

lvii

lx

lxiii

9-180

1-8

9-10

RULES REGULATING THE PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

ON APPEALS TO THE LAW OFFICERS

SCHEDULES TO PATENTS RULES-

Schedule I. List of Patent Fees.

Schedule II. Patents Forms

DESIGNS RULES

211-214

215-217

217-240

241-252