The American and English Encyclopedia of Law1890 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 90
Page 28
... refused to in- dict and plaintiff sued for malicious prosecution . Plaintiff had ordered goods and upon their delivery to him offered a dishonored promissory note in pay- ment for them , which was refused and the vender neither got ...
... refused to in- dict and plaintiff sued for malicious prosecution . Plaintiff had ordered goods and upon their delivery to him offered a dishonored promissory note in pay- ment for them , which was refused and the vender neither got ...
Page 43
... refused to try it . Thomason v . DeMotte , 9 Abb . ( N. Y. ) Pr . 242 . In an action by F against O for hav- ing malicious y caused the arrest of F in a civil action brought against him by O , the proceedings connected with the arrest ...
... refused to try it . Thomason v . DeMotte , 9 Abb . ( N. Y. ) Pr . 242 . In an action by F against O for hav- ing malicious y caused the arrest of F in a civil action brought against him by O , the proceedings connected with the arrest ...
Page 56
... refused to do . Defendant did not state this fact when he sought legal advice as to the prosecution . Held , that he was not exempt from liability . Norrel v . Vogel , 39 Minn . 107 . It is only when there exists probable cause and the ...
... refused to do . Defendant did not state this fact when he sought legal advice as to the prosecution . Held , that he was not exempt from liability . Norrel v . Vogel , 39 Minn . 107 . It is only when there exists probable cause and the ...
Page 61
... refused to leave , whereupon the officer complained of them for breaking and entering with intent to steal , held , that a jury might find that the prosecution was malicious . Robsin v . Kingsbury , 138 Mass . 538 . So where B , knowing ...
... refused to leave , whereupon the officer complained of them for breaking and entering with intent to steal , held , that a jury might find that the prosecution was malicious . Robsin v . Kingsbury , 138 Mass . 538 . So where B , knowing ...
Page 65
... refusal of the examining tribunal to hold the accused over till trial , must necessarily be very persuasive evidence that the prosecu- tion is groundless . Brant v . Higgins , 10 Mo. 728 . The discharge of one charged with crime by the ...
... refusal of the examining tribunal to hold the accused over till trial , must necessarily be very persuasive evidence that the prosecu- tion is groundless . Brant v . Higgins , 10 Mo. 728 . The discharge of one charged with crime by the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action for malicious alleged apply Arnould Mar Bank Barb bottomry cargo claim common law Commrs Conn contract court court of equity coverture creditors damages debt deed defendant duty enforce equity estopped evidence fact feme covert feme sole fraud freight Gratt Gray Mass held husband and wife Iowa issue Johns Jones Judge judgment jury liable lie to compel lien loss malicious prosecution maritime lien marriage married woman ment Minn N. J. Eq Ohio St owner party payment peremptory mandamus person Pick plaintiff port probable cause refusal remedy riage rule ship Smith Stat statute Stewart Stewart H stockholders suit Supervisors Tenn tion tort trustee underwriter valid vessel void voyage want of probable warrant Wend writ of mandamus