The American Journal of International Law, Volume 71James Brown Scott, George Grafton Wilson American Society of International Law, 1977 - Electronic journals The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 78
Page 22
... fact binding on the declarant unless the effect of the dec- laration or assertion of fact has been forseeably to provoke some action on the part of another and some legal detriment to him or equivalent benefit to the declarant for which ...
... fact binding on the declarant unless the effect of the dec- laration or assertion of fact has been forseeably to provoke some action on the part of another and some legal detriment to him or equivalent benefit to the declarant for which ...
Page 68
... fact that in a nascent legal system one must be continually conscious of the effect of a position upon the overall efficacy of the system . Indeed it is clear that in inter- national law the efficacy of the system is more important than ...
... fact that in a nascent legal system one must be continually conscious of the effect of a position upon the overall efficacy of the system . Indeed it is clear that in inter- national law the efficacy of the system is more important than ...
Page 71
... fact that it was uttered by the Permanent Court , but rather in the fact that it recognizes the inherent limits on the prescriptive range of international law when faced with sov- ereign power . One final point against the teleological ...
... fact that it was uttered by the Permanent Court , but rather in the fact that it recognizes the inherent limits on the prescriptive range of international law when faced with sov- ereign power . One final point against the teleological ...
Contents
The Dispute Between Greece and Turkey Concerning the Continental | 31 |
Autointerpretation Competence and the Continuing Validity of Arti | 60 |
Regional Arrangements in the Oceans Lewis M Alexander | 84 |
23 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action agreement AJIL American application arbitration argued Article boundary BRUNSON MACCHESNEY Charter claim coastal Commission Committee concerning Conference conflict Congress congressional constitutional continental shelf Convention countries Court of Appeals decision delimitation Department diplomatic dispute documents economic zone Ecuador effect established European exclusive economic zone execution fisheries force Foreign Sovereign Geneva Convention human rights ICJ REP Index interest international law international legal interpretation islands issue jurisdiction legislation limited Marcona maritime ment military negotiations Northern Ireland obligations OPEC organ participants parties Peru Peruvian political practice President principle problems procedures proposal question regard regional relations relevant Republic resolution respect Roane County rule seabed Section Security Council settlement sovereign immunity Soviet Soviet Union status supra note territorial sea tion treaty U.S. Government unilateral declaration United Kingdom United Nations University vessel violation War Powers Resolution