The American Journal of International Law, Volume 71James Brown Scott, George Grafton Wilson American Society of International Law, 1977 - Electronic journals The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 76
Page 26
... position that a unilateral declaration was not binding on the declarant and that it could be revoked by the declarant . There is no evidence that this position , which might even be considered a unilateral declaration by France taking a ...
... position that a unilateral declaration was not binding on the declarant and that it could be revoked by the declarant . There is no evidence that this position , which might even be considered a unilateral declaration by France taking a ...
Page 229
... position thus barring consensus at that stage was pressed by a number of states , demanding more absolute operation of the prin- ciple of priority , by omitting , for example , the words " in contravention of the Charter " as well as ...
... position thus barring consensus at that stage was pressed by a number of states , demanding more absolute operation of the prin- ciple of priority , by omitting , for example , the words " in contravention of the Charter " as well as ...
Page 300
... position , in keeping with well - estab- lished practice , simply that it is legitimate for governments to enter into gentlemen's agreements recognizing that they are without legal effect . This still leaves us with questions as to the ...
... position , in keeping with well - estab- lished practice , simply that it is legitimate for governments to enter into gentlemen's agreements recognizing that they are without legal effect . This still leaves us with questions as to the ...
Contents
The Dispute Between Greece and Turkey Concerning the Continental | 31 |
Autointerpretation Competence and the Continuing Validity of Arti | 60 |
Regional Arrangements in the Oceans Lewis M Alexander | 84 |
23 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action agreement AJIL American application arbitration argued Article boundary BRUNSON MACCHESNEY Charter claim coastal Commission Committee concerning Conference conflict Congress congressional constitutional continental shelf Convention countries Court of Appeals decision delimitation Department diplomatic dispute documents economic zone Ecuador effect established European exclusive economic zone execution fisheries force Foreign Sovereign Geneva Convention human rights ICJ REP Index interest international law international legal interpretation islands issue jurisdiction legislation limited Marcona maritime ment military negotiations Northern Ireland obligations OPEC organ participants parties Peru Peruvian political practice President principle problems procedures proposal question regard regional relations relevant Republic resolution respect Roane County rule seabed Section Security Council settlement sovereign immunity Soviet Soviet Union status supra note territorial sea tion treaty U.S. Government unilateral declaration United Kingdom United Nations University vessel violation War Powers Resolution