The American Journal of International Law, Volume 71James Brown Scott, George Grafton Wilson American Society of International Law, 1977 - Electronic journals The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 73
Page 339
... sovereign immunity , as presently recognized in international law . Under this principle , the immunity of a foreign state is " restricted " to suits involving a foreign state's public acts ( jure imperii ) and does not extend to suits ...
... sovereign immunity , as presently recognized in international law . Under this principle , the immunity of a foreign state is " restricted " to suits involving a foreign state's public acts ( jure imperii ) and does not extend to suits ...
Page 340
James Brown Scott, George Grafton Wilson. BACKGROUND Sovereign immunity is a doctrine of international law under which domestic courts , in appropriate cases , relinquish jurisdiction over a foreign state . It differs from diplomatic ...
James Brown Scott, George Grafton Wilson. BACKGROUND Sovereign immunity is a doctrine of international law under which domestic courts , in appropriate cases , relinquish jurisdiction over a foreign state . It differs from diplomatic ...
Page 341
... immunity in almost every instance . However , the executive branch learned that almost every country in Western Europe followed the restrictive principle of sovereign immunity and the Government's pleas of im- munity were routinely ...
... immunity in almost every instance . However , the executive branch learned that almost every country in Western Europe followed the restrictive principle of sovereign immunity and the Government's pleas of im- munity were routinely ...
Contents
The Dispute Between Greece and Turkey Concerning the Continental | 31 |
Autointerpretation Competence and the Continuing Validity of Arti | 60 |
Regional Arrangements in the Oceans Lewis M Alexander | 84 |
23 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action agreement AJIL American application arbitration argued Article boundary BRUNSON MACCHESNEY Charter claim coastal Commission Committee concerning Conference conflict Congress congressional constitutional continental shelf Convention countries Court of Appeals decision delimitation Department diplomatic dispute documents economic zone Ecuador effect established European exclusive economic zone execution fisheries force Foreign Sovereign Geneva Convention human rights ICJ REP Index interest international law international legal interpretation islands issue jurisdiction legislation limited Marcona maritime ment military negotiations Northern Ireland obligations OPEC organ participants parties Peru Peruvian political practice President principle problems procedures proposal question regard regional relations relevant Republic resolution respect Roane County rule seabed Section Security Council settlement sovereign immunity Soviet Soviet Union status supra note territorial sea tion treaty U.S. Government unilateral declaration United Kingdom United Nations University vessel violation War Powers Resolution