The American Journal of International Law, Volume 57American Society of International Law, 1963 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 83
Page 209
... rule for the adoption of the texts of treaties drawn up at conferences or within or- ganizations . Unanimity remains the general rule for bilateral treaties and for treaties drawn up between very few states . But for other multi ...
... rule for the adoption of the texts of treaties drawn up at conferences or within or- ganizations . Unanimity remains the general rule for bilateral treaties and for treaties drawn up between very few states . But for other multi ...
Page 210
... rule by which it is to decide upon its substantive voting rule for adopting the text of the treaty . Some members of the Commission con- sidered that the procedural vote should be taken by simple majority . Others felt that such a rule ...
... rule by which it is to decide upon its substantive voting rule for adopting the text of the treaty . Some members of the Commission con- sidered that the procedural vote should be taken by simple majority . Others felt that such a rule ...
Page 222
... rule is very small . This does not necessarily mean that there is no need to formulate a rule for the small residuum of cases in which the parties have left the question open . For it is one of the pur- poses of codification to provide ...
... rule is very small . This does not necessarily mean that there is no need to formulate a rule for the small residuum of cases in which the parties have left the question open . For it is one of the pur- poses of codification to provide ...
Contents
REFLECTIONS UPON THE POLITICAL OFFENSE IN INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE Alona | 1 |
THE LEGAL STATUS OF FORMOSA J P Jain | 25 |
PEACEKEEPING AND DISARMAMENT Alan F Neidle | 46 |
Copyright | |
6 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted action adopted agreement Algerian American application Arbitration Article Assembly authority British subjects Bulgaria China claims Commission Committee Commonwealth Communist concerning Conference constitute Convention countries Court of Justice Cuba Cuban decision Declaration defense depositary Detaining Power diplomatic disarmament dispute draft Droit economic effect established European extradition force foreign Formosa French Geneva Geneva Convention German Government Hague Ibid International Court international law International Law Commission jurisdiction Laos League of Nations legislation Mandate ment military national law negotiations Netherlands nuclear obligations offense Office opinion organization paragraph parties peace political present President principles prisoners prisoners of war problem procedure Professor Protocol provisions purpose quarantine question Quincy Wright ratification regard relations Republic reservation resolution rule Security Council self-defense settlement ship sovereignty Soviet Union space law status Taiwan territory tion treaty Treaty Series United Kingdom United Nations Charter University violation World