TABLE OF CONTENTS. Abercrombie, et al. and Graham, et al.552 Borland v. Mayo,......... .104 Acre and Taylor,. .491 | Bothwell, et al. v. Hamilton. et al. ...461 Agee v. Steele,... .948 Bowling v. Bowling, Ex'r, .538 Allums, et al. v. Hawley, 584 Bradford and Lewis, 632 Anderson v. Dickson, .733 Broadnax v. Sims' Ex'r,... .497 Anderson v. Snow & Co. et al.......504 Brooks & Lucas v. Godwin, .296 ..791 Holley Holley et al. and Hollinger et al....454 Hollinger & wife v. Br. B'k Mobile, 605 Hollinger et al. v. Holly et al. .......454 .357 Horton v. Smith,... 73 Frow and Tait. use, &c.,.........543 Flanagan v. Gilchrist,.. lett & Walker,.. Foster et al. and Magee, Foster and Mixon, Frazier and Houston,. .... Frierson & Crow and Skinner, ......915 Gaines & Townsend and Barnett,...373 Ganaway v. Griffin, Garey v. Hines, Garner v. Green and Elliott,. Garrett, et al and Hughes, et al....483 Gayle v. Cahawba & M. R. R. Co.... 586 Gewen and Leiper, George v. Cahawba & M. R. R. Co..234 Gilchrist and Flanagan, Gilmer v. Wier, Givens and Marriott & Hardesty, ... 694 Givens v. Tidmore, Godwin and Brooks & Lucas, 29 Julian et al. v. Reynolds, et al... 680 Mooney, use, &c. v. Ivey, ...810 Justice and Cole, use, &c. ...793 Mooney v. The State..... ..328 Kennedy et al. v. Bebee et al. ....909 Morehouse and Smoot & Easton,....370 Kennedy and Kennedy's Adm'r,. ..391 Kirksey v. Kirksey,. 131 Morrow & Co.and Gooden & McKee, 486 Kirksey et al. v. Mitchell, .402 Morrow & Nelson v. Weaver & Frow, 288 Knight and The Governor, use, &c. 297 Murphy v. Paul,. Smoot & Easton v. Morehouse .......370 Travis v. Tartt 574 655 Treadwell, Guar. v. Burden, Adm'r 660 REPORTS OF CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED, JANUARY TERM, 1845. ALEXANDER GRAHAM v. JOHN LOCKHART. 1. A deed of trust operative as a security for the payment of money, is not fraudulent per se, on account of the reservation of uses to the grantor. 2. Quere? Whether a deed conveying property for the benefit of sureties, and fixing the law day of the deed to a time subsequent to the maturity of the debts, for which the sureties are bound, is operative as a conveyance, without the assent of the sureties. 3. So far as the particular creditor is concerned, the debtor, with his assent may stipulate that the effects conveyed may be continued, in trade or planting, for a definite or indefinite period, but such a stipulation cannot prevent any other creditor from his right to sell the resulting trust of the debtor, in satisfaction of his execution. 4. Quere? Whether a debtor, by the mortgage of his perishable personal es- 5. The powers of a Court of Equity are sufficient to prevent injury to the 7. In claims interposed under the statute, to property which is levied on as 8 9 98 273 8 9 108 492 8 9 111 225 |