The American Journal of International Law, Volume 35American Society of International Law, 1941 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 61
Page 100
Accordingly , the committee suggested that a final committee of experts , representing the interested governments , be convened to make final revisions in the convention which would then be open for signature . This Committee of Experts ...
Accordingly , the committee suggested that a final committee of experts , representing the interested governments , be convened to make final revisions in the convention which would then be open for signature . This Committee of Experts ...
Page 106
... Final Act signed by the delegates , and independent of the respective treaties . In each case the Final Act interpreted some of the provisions of the treaties and established the policy which it was expected each nation would adopt in ...
... Final Act signed by the delegates , and independent of the respective treaties . In each case the Final Act interpreted some of the provisions of the treaties and established the policy which it was expected each nation would adopt in ...
Page 401
... final and conclusive in the courts , not because the conduct of the Secretary and the Commission preceding certification meets approval of the courts , but because power to make final determination rests with the political departments ...
... final and conclusive in the courts , not because the conduct of the Secretary and the Commission preceding certification meets approval of the courts , but because power to make final determination rests with the political departments ...
Contents
VOL | 35 |
No 1 January 1941 pp 1204 No 2 April 1941 pp 205428 No 3 July 1941 pp 429 604 No 4 October 1941 pp 605759 PAGE | 41 |
THE MOSTFAVOREDNATION CLAUSE AND THE COURTS Norman J Padelford | 55 |
18 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action agreement aliens American Republics application arbitration Article awards belligerent Bilbao Britain British Canal Zone citizens claim clause Commission Commissioner Committee concerning conclusion Conference Conflict of Laws Congress constitutional Convention decision declaration defense Department diplomatic dispute droit international duty effect El Condado enemy expropriation fact force foreign French German Hague Hague Convention Ibid Index interest international law islands JOURNAL jurisdiction Justice Kellogg-Briand Pact League of Nations legislation Lord Lord Atkin Majesty's Government ment Moss Island most-favored-nation neutral non-belligerent obligations Office opinion Pacific Pact Panama Canal parties peace Permanent Court political ports possession President principle problem proclamation protection provisions Puerto Rico question ratification recognized regard regulations relations respect rule Secretary Sept ships sovereign sovereignty statute Tangier Tariff Act territory Text tion trade treaty Treaty Series Umpire United vessels violation whales