The American Journal of International Law, Volume 63American Society of International Law, 1969 - Electronic journals The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 84
Page 286
... President ( or the Congress ) the authority to act in the manner complained of ; he having done so , the courts must give effect to that action . The courts , then , are not refraining from judging the action by constitutional standards ...
... President ( or the Congress ) the authority to act in the manner complained of ; he having done so , the courts must give effect to that action . The courts , then , are not refraining from judging the action by constitutional standards ...
Page 408
... President affords an opportunity to the judges to exchange such views as they may wish to express at this stage with regard to those proceedings , and to bring out any point in regard to which it may be necessary to call for ...
... President affords an opportunity to the judges to exchange such views as they may wish to express at this stage with regard to those proceedings , and to bring out any point in regard to which it may be necessary to call for ...
Page 409
... President in inverse order of seniority , must declare their views . During this deliberation , any judge may cir- culate an additional question or a reformulation of a question already listed in the written notes . On the request of ...
... President in inverse order of seniority , must declare their views . During this deliberation , any judge may cir- culate an additional question or a reformulation of a question already listed in the written notes . On the request of ...
Contents
EcuadoreanPeruvian Boundary Dispute Georg Maier | 28 |
Communist China and the Law of the Sea Tao Cheng | 47 |
The Time Element in the Contentious Proceedings in the Inter | 74 |
Copyright | |
28 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action agreement aircraft aircraft hijacking amendment American application arbitration areas Article Assembly authority Beirut boundary Charter China Claims Relating coastal Commission Committee Communist concerned Conference constitutional continental shelf Continental Shelf Convention Contracting countries customary international law decision Declaration delimitation dispute documents draft economic Ecuador effect enforcement equidistance Federal Republic fishing force foreign Geneva Convention Government hijacking hoc judges human rights Ibid Index International Court international law International Law Commission interpretation Israel issue judgment jurisdiction limits ment Namibia negotiations nuclear weapons obligations opinion organization paragraph parties peaceful Peru political present President principle problem Professor proposed Protocol provisions question refugees regard Report rescue resolution respect rĂ´le Security Council sedentary fisheries settlement Society of International South West Africa Soviet Union status territorial sea tion tional treaty Treaty Series tribunal Trusteeship United Kingdom United Nations United Nations Charter University vote