Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

In

1901 11,156 1905 200

[ocr errors]

REPORT OF THE RAILROAD WAGE COMMISSION

Number Up $600 $1000 Up of to to to to Date Families $600 $1000 $2000 $600 17

265

51

42

35

[ocr errors][merged small]

COMPARISON OF VARIOUS FAMILY BUDGETS.

PERCENTAGE OF EXPENDITURE FOR SPECIFIED ITEMS.

BY INCOME GROUPS

[blocks in formation]

TABLE 2.

[ocr errors]

comes comes comes comes comes comes comes comes comes comes comes comes comes comes comes comes comes comes

43

44 44 45 26

41

41

46

Rent

Clothing
In- In- In- In- In- In-

37

40

19

22

[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]

17

19

17

127

20

[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]

17

12

17

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Fuel and Light
In- In- In-

14

10

16

[ocr errors]

16

15 6

[ocr errors]

Food Rent Clothing Fuel Sundries Total

57

15

100%

55

100%

53

100% 100%

52

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

16

6

5

11 6 5

1222

5

11

7

In

5

4

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

12

5

17

5 13

These ratios were used in arriving at the combined per cents of increases for all items of family expenditures, from January 1, 1916 to January 1, 1918 as given in Part I. See also Table 4 of Part II. The ratios for specified incomes under $600 were taken from the U. S. Bureau of Labor report of 1901, adjusted to bring up to date. These %s as adjusted were

Income

Up to $200 $200 to $300

$300 to $400 $400 to $500

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

Family budgets giving incomes and expenses in detail for the calendar years 1915 and 1917 were secured by the Commission through newspaper editors in selected cities in different parts of the country. The results furnished fresh data on the proportion of expenditures for each main item of the family budget, and also threw some light on the relation of expenses to income in 1915 compared with 1917. Appendix C shows the form of questionaire used.

Table 3 gives a brief summary of the results and Chart No. 1 illustrates the relation of expenses to income. These results must be used with caution, since they are at best nothing more than a composite of careful guesses, as very families keep trustworthy records. The "Annual Income" shown for the different territories and income groups must not be accepted as showing a differential in wage scales. The variation is purely accidental due to the varying size (income) of families selected by the editors. The amount of "Surpluses" and "Deficits" should be interpreted as tendencies rather than precise amounts or relationships.

Table 4 shows the percent distribution of total expenses by objects of expenditure. These ratios are generally consistent with other budgetary experience (See Table 2 of Part I).

Table 5 gives the percent increase in the total income and total expenses reported for 1915 and 1917. For all of the 265 budgets combined the increase in income was 10% for the smaller income group and 14% for the larger, compared with 27% increase in expenses for each group. The increase for expenses is not as large as the known increases in relative prices for the various items that enter into the family budget (see Table 1, Part I), and a comparison of the two gives some indication of the economies and substitutions practiced.

Table 6 is a detailed summary of the absolute figures shown by the 265 budgets with the computed ratioa and averages.

[blocks in formation]

d Deficit

TABLE 3.

Annual
Expenses
1915 1917

$ 720 $ 944
1,150 1,469

741 1,111

914 1,508

900 1,412

818

743
728 924
1,269 1,446 1,143 1,447

1,031 1,162 955 1,210

106

152

46

123

15 127

76

임의

63d

10

1054

1d

484

Number of Families Reporting Surplus Deficit Surplus

31

7 24

27

41

5

18

2

5

33 1

23

55

55

114

169

[blocks in formation]

Income Group No. 1 Comprises families with incomes up to $1,000.
No. 2
from $1,000 to $2,000

#

#

#1

#1

#

"

96

Deficit 52

23

2

12

30

31

84

56

140

CHART NO. 1.

PERCENT EXPENSES ARE OF INCOME. 265 FAMILY BUDGETS COLLECTED BY R.R. Commission. (The ratios under 100 indicate a surplus; those over 100 a deficit) 1.C.C. Territory INCOME ANNUAL YEAR 80

AVERAGE

90

100

110

[blocks in formation]

120

119

1915

1917

3-1-18
W.A.H.

Key

1

Total

U.S..

Income up to $600.. Income $600 to $1000... Income $1000 to $2000.....

I.C.C.

Food Rent Clothing Fuel & Light Sundries Total Income Income Income Income Income Income Income Income Income Income Income Income TERRIGroup Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group TORY Year 1 2 EAST- 1915 44 35 ERN 1917 48

1

2

2

2

1

1

1 13

2 23

1 100

20

20

16

38

17

13

17

22

100

SOUTH-1915 51
ERN 1917

WEST- 1915
ERN
1917

40
46

1915

38

35

21

“#|

1917

51

42

35

PER CENT DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL EXPENSES

--OF--
265 FAMILY BUDGETS COLLECTED BY R. R. WAGE COMMISSION.

35

42

56

18

39

1915

20

17

2Q

20

21

18

17

14

17

18

TABLE 4.

15

20

28 14 16 8

18

13

14

15

1917 1915 1917 1915

17

15

16

11

14

[ocr errors]

16

7

5

6

6

7

6

[blocks in formation]

Income Group No. 1 Comprises families with Incomes up to $1000
No. 2
01 $1000 to $2000.

11

"

"

11

"

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

1917

100

100

100

100

« PreviousContinue »