The American Journal of International Law, Volume 10American Society of International Law, 1916 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 99
Page xix
... Washington , and for the nomination of an umpire . The German Government submits a draft of a com- promis relative to the in- terpretation of the Prus- sian - American treaties . PART VI . Exportation of Arms and Munitions of War ...
... Washington , and for the nomination of an umpire . The German Government submits a draft of a com- promis relative to the in- terpretation of the Prus- sian - American treaties . PART VI . Exportation of Arms and Munitions of War ...
Page xx
... Washington . No. From and to whom . Date . Subject . Page . 1915 . The Secretary of State to Ambassador Penfield Sept. 8 ( telegram ) . Instructs him to request the recall of the Ambassador of Austria - Hungary . 361 Ambassador Penfield ...
... Washington . No. From and to whom . Date . Subject . Page . 1915 . The Secretary of State to Ambassador Penfield Sept. 8 ( telegram ) . Instructs him to request the recall of the Ambassador of Austria - Hungary . 361 Ambassador Penfield ...
Page 60
sador at Washington as conceding all that the American interests could properly ask . It was never suggested that vessels or cargoes with an enemy destination should be allowed to proceed . His Majesty's Govern- ment were , moreover ...
sador at Washington as conceding all that the American interests could properly ask . It was never suggested that vessels or cargoes with an enemy destination should be allowed to proceed . His Majesty's Govern- ment were , moreover ...
Page 63
... Washington , August 6 , 1915 . Comments have reached His Majesty's Government from various quarters that a misapprehension seems to have arisen with regard to the British note of July 31 concerning the steamer Neches , 1 which it was ...
... Washington , August 6 , 1915 . Comments have reached His Majesty's Government from various quarters that a misapprehension seems to have arisen with regard to the British note of July 31 concerning the steamer Neches , 1 which it was ...
Page 64
... Washington reported on the 22d July that the Acting Councillor of the State Department had referred in conversation to the unfavourable impression created at Washington by reports as to the increase in British exports to northern ...
... Washington reported on the 22d July that the Acting Councillor of the State Department had referred in conversation to the unfavourable impression created at Washington by reports as to the increase in British exports to northern ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affidavit Allied Governments Ambassador Gerard Ambassador Penfield Ambassador W. H. American citizens American Consulate AMERICAN EMBASSY Appam April April 13 April 24 Arabic armed August belligerent ber of Article blockade boats Britain British Government British ports captain commander Conditional Contraband consigned cotton Cottonseed cake cruisers Declaration of London Department destination detained Dunsley enemy explosion exports fire Foreign Affairs Foreign Office German German Government German submarine graph of Date high seas honor Imperial and Royal Imperial Government Inclosure instructions international law June Maize Majesty's Government March March 11 March 28 memorandum ment merchant vessels military nations naval neutral countries neutral ports note verbale Number Order in Council passengers persons prize court prize crew Proclamation References and Notes regard rubber Schedule I mation Secretary seizure ship steamer steamship submarine Sussex telegram tion torpedo trade Transmits United States Government Washington
Popular passages
Page 80 - The neutral flag covers enemy's goods, with the exception of contraband of war ; 3. Neutral goods, with the exception of contraband of war, are not liable to capture under enemy's flag; 4. Blockades, in order to be binding, must be effective ; that is to say, maintained by a force sufficient really to prevent access to the coast of the enemy.
Page 81 - Whatever may be the ulterior destination of a vessel or of her cargo, she cannot be captured for breach of blockade, if, at the moment, she is on her way to a non-blockaded port.
Page 199 - Should the steps taken by the Government of the United States not attain the object it desires to have the laws of humanity followed by all belligerent nations, the German Government would then be facing a new situation, in which it must reserve itself complete liberty of decision.
Page 387 - The Secretary of State to the British Ambassador. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Washington, February 3, 1916.
Page 7 - A vessel carrying contraband may be condemned if the contraband, reckoned either by value, weight, volume, or freight, forms more than half the cargo.
Page 6 - Present, the King's Most Excellent Majesty in Council. Whereas by the Declaration of London Order in Council No. 2, 1914...
Page 391 - ... put under legal process when they come to and enter the ports of the other party, but may freely be carried out again at any time by their captors to the places expressed in their commissions, which the commanding officer of such vessel shall be obliged to show.
Page 188 - States might find it possible to hope that the officer who was responsible for that act had wilfully violated his orders or had been criminally negligent in taking none of the precautions they prescribed, and that the ends of justice might be satisfied by imposing upon him an adequate punishment, coupled with a formal disavowal of the act and payment of a suitable indemnity by the Imperial Government. But, though the attack upon the Sussex...
Page 6 - Now, therefore, His Majesty, by and with the advice of His Privy Council, is pleased to order, and it is hereby ordered, that the Declaration of London Order in Council No.
Page 17 - Implements and apparatus designed exclusively for the manufacture of munitions of war, for the manufacture or repair of arms, or war material for use on land or sea.