Law's ViolenceAustin Sarat, Thomas R. Kearns "In bringing together accomplished and thoughtful scholars of different disciplines, with a command of literature ranging from the legal to the literary, and in relating the works to the central arguments of the late Professor Robert Cover, Sarat and Kearns have created a first-rate up-to-date exposition of this important and complicated issue, namely, how to understand better the violence implicit and explicit in law."--Legal Studies Forum The relationship between law and violence is made familiar to us in vivid pictures of police beating suspects, the large and growing prison population, and the tenacious attachment to capital punishment in the United States. Yet the link between law and violence and the ways that law manages to impose pain and death while remaining aloof and unstained are an unexplored mystery. Each essay in this volume considers the question of how violence done by and in the name of the law differs from illegal or extralegal violence--or, indeed, if they differ at all. Each author draws on a distinctive disciplinary tradition-- literature, history, anthropology, philosophy, political science, or law. Yet each reminds us that law, constituted in response to the metaphorical violence of the state of nature, is itself a doer of literal violence. Austin Sarat is William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science and Chair of the Program in Law, Jurisprudence, and Social Thought, Amherst College. Thomas R. Kearns is William H. Hastie Professor of Philosophy, Amherst College. |
Contents
Introduction | 1 |
Elaine Scarry | 23 |
A Judges Perspective | 77 |
Copyright | |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action appear argues argument authority become believe Black capital century changes claim commitment Congress congressional constitutional Court Cover crime criminal critics cultural death decisions declaration defendant Deliberations distinction effect enforcement England essay example execution exist fact force give House human Ilongot imagine important increase individual inequality interest interpretation issue judges Justice Kaluli killing language law's violence legitimate limits literature lives material meaning moral narrative nature Nomos normative organization pain particular performative persons police political population possible practice present president presidential prison punishment question reading reasons refers represent response Review Robert rules self-help Senate sense sentence social society speaker speech suggests texts textual theory things trial understanding United University Press vote White York