Reports of Cases at Law and in Equity Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Arkansas, Volume 20B.J. Borden, 1859 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 63
Page 19
... administrator , believing the guardian's bond to be insufficient , took a deed for the land from the guardian , and credited the price on his indebtedness as guardian , charging interest thereon up to the time of the conveyance : Held ...
... administrator , believing the guardian's bond to be insufficient , took a deed for the land from the guardian , and credited the price on his indebtedness as guardian , charging interest thereon up to the time of the conveyance : Held ...
Page 20
... administrator , took the land in part pay- ment of a debt due the estate on account of the insolvency of Cross , the guardian , and his securities . Mr. Justice BATSON delivered the opinion of the Court . This was a bill filed on the ...
... administrator , took the land in part pay- ment of a debt due the estate on account of the insolvency of Cross , the guardian , and his securities . Mr. Justice BATSON delivered the opinion of the Court . This was a bill filed on the ...
Page 22
... administrator by the promis- sory notes of said Cross and others . That the purchases made by administrator were for the interest of the estate , and that the lands and negroes are in no wise necessary for , but are incumbrances to ...
... administrator by the promis- sory notes of said Cross and others . That the purchases made by administrator were for the interest of the estate , and that the lands and negroes are in no wise necessary for , but are incumbrances to ...
Page 23
... performance ; and that the conveyance to Caldwell , the administrator , in trust , for the benefit of the heirs , and passing credit to Cross for the amount , Byrd & wife et al . vs. Lipscomb et al OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS . 23.
... performance ; and that the conveyance to Caldwell , the administrator , in trust , for the benefit of the heirs , and passing credit to Cross for the amount , Byrd & wife et al . vs. Lipscomb et al OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS . 23.
Page 24
... administrator , at the same price he had demanded near three years previous to that time ; and per- mitting interest to be computed from the date of the order of the Probate Court , up to the time of making the conveyance , shows that ...
... administrator , at the same price he had demanded near three years previous to that time ; and per- mitting interest to be computed from the date of the order of the Probate Court , up to the time of making the conveyance , shows that ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adverse possession advs agreement alleged answer appellant appellee attorney Bank bill of sale Borden Brittin certificate Chancery charter Chester Ashley Chief Justice ENGLISH Circuit Court Circuit Judge claim Clary & Latimer complainant contract Conway corporation County Court Court of Chancery court of equity Crabtree creditors debt declaration decree deed defendant delivered the opinion demurrer entitled evidence execution facts ferry filed Fowler fraud Gould's Handy heirs Hempstead Hempstead county indictment interest issue JANUARY John G judgment jurisdiction jury Justice ENGLISH delivered Land Agent lien Little Rock Lumpkin ment negroes paid parties payment person plaintiff plea Pope county possession Probate Court proceedings Pulaski county purchase record Rector Red river road sheriff slaves sold statute of limitations suit taxes TERM testimony thereof tiel tion tract trial trust Van Buren county void Wassell Watkins wife witness writ
Popular passages
Page 590 - Unless this were so, there would be no certainty in the law; for a misconstruction by the Court is the proper subject, by means of a bill of exceptions, of redress in a Court of Error; but a misconstruction by the jury cannot be set right at all effectually.
Page 402 - It would be repugnant to a sense of refined and accurate justice. It would be immoral, because it would be against the reciprocal obligation to do nothing to the prejudice of each other's equal claim, which the relationship of the parties as joint devisees created. Community of interest produces a community of duty; and there is no real difference, on the ground of policy and justice, whether one cotenant buys up an outstanding incumbrance or an adverse title to disseise and expel his cotenant.
Page 449 - Respondent moved for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence, that it was a compromise verdict, and that the damages allowed were inadequate.
Page 402 - It is not consistent with good faith, nor with the duty which the connection of the parties, as claimants of a common subject, created, that one of them should be able, without the consent of the other, to buy in an outstanding title, and appropriate the whole subject to himself and thus undermine and oust his companion.
Page 225 - The connection of the individuals In the unlawful enterprise being thus shown, every act and declaration of each member of the confederacy, in pursuance of the original concerted plan, and with reference to the common object, is, in contemplation of law, the act and declaration of them all, and Is, therefore, original evidence against each of them.
Page 91 - A judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, directly upon the point, is conclusive between the same parties, or their privies, upon the same matter, coming directly in question in another court of concurrent jurisdiction.
Page 140 - Until the general assembly shall deem it expedient to establish courts of chancery the circuit courts shall have jurisdiction in matters of equity, subject to appeal to the supreme court, in such manner as may be prescribed by law.
Page 32 - By multifariousness in a bill is meant, the improperly joining in one bill distinct and independent matters, and thereby confounding them; as, for example, the uniting in one bill of several matters perfectly distinct and unconnected against one defendant, or the demand -of several matters of a distinct and independent nature against several defendants, in the same bill.
Page 199 - Every deposit is a direct trust. Every person who receives money to be paid to another, or to be applied to a particular purpose, to which he does not apply it, is a trustee, and may be sued, either at law, for money had and received, or in equity as a trustee, for a breach of trust.
Page 33 - So it is not indispensable that all the parties should have an interest in all the matters contained in the suit; it will be sufficient if each party has an interest in some matters in the suit, and they are connected with the others.