The American Journal of International Law, Volume 30American Society of International Law, 1936 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 34
... tion ( No. 2 ) of May 25 , and the terms of Article V of the treaty of 1928 , the designation of the fifth arbitrator . This also was refused by the Italian members . Separate opinions were issued by the Italian and Ethiopian - ap ...
... tion ( No. 2 ) of May 25 , and the terms of Article V of the treaty of 1928 , the designation of the fifth arbitrator . This also was refused by the Italian members . Separate opinions were issued by the Italian and Ethiopian - ap ...
Page 265
tion of the law as of August 1 , 1914 , the Administration intends to uphold in case of war . This is not intended as a hostile criticism ; it is rather a further commentary on certain defects in our governmental machinery and its opera- ...
tion of the law as of August 1 , 1914 , the Administration intends to uphold in case of war . This is not intended as a hostile criticism ; it is rather a further commentary on certain defects in our governmental machinery and its opera- ...
Page 545
... tion placed upon the defendant government should have been more ex- plicitly stringent than the plaintiff has established . The conclusion , as explained above under No. IV , must be repeated : that the government can only be deemed to ...
... tion placed upon the defendant government should have been more ex- plicitly stringent than the plaintiff has established . The conclusion , as explained above under No. IV , must be repeated : that the government can only be deemed to ...
Contents
THE FOURTEENTH YEAR OF THE PERMANENT COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE | 1 |
THE WAL WAL ARBITRATION Pitman B Potter 27 | 27 |
THE TEST OF AGGRESSION IN THE ITALOETHIOPIAN WAR Quincy Wright | 45 |
24 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adopted agreement Albanian American application April arbitration Article Assembly authority belligerents Britain British cartel citizens citizenship claims clause Commission Committee conclusion Conference Congress Constitution contract Convention coöperation Council Court of International Covenant Czechoslovakia Danzig decision declared denial of justice diplomatic discussion dispute Droit International embargo Ethiopia existing fact force foreign France Geneva Germany gold coin Government Hague HAGUE CONVENTION Ibid important interest International Justice international law interpretation Italian Italy JOURNAL June jurisdiction League of Nations legislation Lithuania Locarno Treaty Memel Memel Territory ment Minister Monroe Doctrine negotiations neutrality obligations Office Pact paragraph parties peace Permanent Court political President principle proclamation Protocol provisions question radio ratification regard Reichstag relations Republic resolution rules sanctions Secretary Senate Sept Soviet Stat stateless persons Statute territory tion Treaty of Versailles Treaty Series United violation Weimar Constitution