Page images
PDF
EPUB

THE LIFE

OF

THE RIGHT HON. FRANCIS NORTH,

LORD GUILFORD;

LORD KEEPER OF THE GREAT SEAL OF ENGLAND.

tion, show

sign and

reason.

My design is to leave behind me all that I can Introducremember or warrantably collect concerning the ing the delife of the Lord Keeper North. A work much needed; and to which I am indeed provoked, because I find an affected endeavour of a prevailing sort of men in these latter times, and especially the more solemn writers of English affairs, to suppress all memory of his lordship's name and worth, to the end that his character and behaviour in the course of his great employments should be utterly unknown to aftertimes, as if no such person had ever lived in the world. I shall allege but one instance, and that is an egregious one. A late doublecolumned historian,* in folio, of whom mention

[blocks in formation]

Declined

has been made already in the preface, writing the affairs of England, and in particular what fell out in the reign of King Charles II., hath taken upon him to characterise the famous men that died in his several years; and yet of the Lord Keeper North no single word slips from his pen, and one must look very hard to find so much as his name in the whole work: and, considering the value of that great justitiar (which I hope will be made appear in what follows), is not so notorious partiality, in such a pompous writer of history, wonderful? But not only there, but in all the other writers of those times, when the quality of those things related require him to be named, however the actions or occasion might deserve, it is done in an ill-natured manner, and with a leer, implying rather disgrace than any honour to his memory. And since his death we do not find in ordinary converse, or consultation of things past, any mention of him, or, at most, but as one that had been preferred to serve turns; and so, dying, there was an end of him.

Now here, to make the fairest construction of fame in all this silence in a case so eminent, and ascribe it things. chiefly to ignorance, although I think time-servingness and malice hath the greatest share, I will show that in his lordship's case there was less obvious means for fame than in any other great man's case whatever. For first, he was quite out

of favour with the busy agitating party of men in his time, then termed the fanatic party; and those are the chief architects of fame: and, having nothing ill to say of him, they would say no good, and therefore chose to say nothing at all. If he had acted in these men's measures, and, betraying his master, took in with them, and become their property, he had certainly been the most illustrious hero in the law that ever was heard of. Another reason is derived from his lordship's own conduct of himself, which was always with the greatest modesty, and the least affectation of fame that could be. He rather withdrew himself from it, as being, in his opinion, an empty vanity; and ever labouring to act well and substantially, as concerned for the truth and intelligence of things, and not for any honour to be got thereby, he scarce ever did any thing for show, or spoke a word for the sake of mere sound or ostentation; but in all he did, to have reason on his side, and to make himself therein readily understood, was all that he aimed at otherwise he bore himself retired from public view and eclat as much as ever he could. It is no great wonder therefore, that nothing pompous hath been remembered of him. If he had carried it high, headed parties, and embraced the management of what had not belonged to him, and the like, it had been otherwise; or if he had printed his collections in the law, of which

The en

and means

to this

work.

he had made some considerable, or the other tracts he had in his mind to make fit for the use of his time, or done any thing else, which ordinarily great men do for fame and honour, he might have left a name behind him great as he deserved; but he never let any thing come to the press under his name but what belonged to his office, or was absolutely necessary for his vindication. It is no wonder therefore, that (the malice or ignorance of historians apart) there is so little remembrance of this noble person's life and actions (so near his time as we are) now extant; and, probably, after a reign or two more, bating a formal list of Lord Keepers, that lets none escape, his very name will be forgot.

Here is reason enough to incline any one, engagements dued with competent information of the subject, and a literate capacity to digest and express what he knows thereof, to rescue this honourable person and his great abilities, his approved justice and integrity, and universal good-will, from utter oblivion, by writing the history of his lordship's life. But where do those qualifications concur? The very expectation of them puts me in mind of latter Lammas. But it is usual to say, what good cannot be done in perfection, as it should be, ought to be done, though but in part, or as it may be. And, upon force of that consideration, I am inclined to undertake it; for, if I am wanting in

capacity to write as the subject deserves, I am capable of informing others who may do it better; and am therein farther urged by the consideration of my former felicities. For it was my good fortune to be so nearly allied to him, and, by circumstances of education and profession, so closely attached to his person, that we were almost inseparable. Therefore, upon the strength of the latter of these qualifications, whatever becomes of the former, which, in sense of my own inability, I forbear to claim, I am induced to undertake this great work, which I would have understood to be rather instructions, than history. And if I am required to give an account of my great confidence therein, I must allege that, if I am not the best instructed of any man living for it, it is my own fault; because I passed almost all the active time of my life in his company. And now almost all persons of his intimacy, capable or concerned to remember much of him, are dead, or at least, after so many years, thoughtless of all they might once have known concerning him: but I am at this time left a living and sensible witness of his most public and most retired behaviour; and moreover a well-qualified compurgator of all his thoughts and actions and who else should be called upon to show to posterity what he was? And also that there was once a magistrate of a kind, since the loss of him (barring all comparisons) rather to be

:

« PreviousContinue »