Reports of Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Cases, Issues 1-5; Issues 8-13Published at the Patent Office Sales Branch, 2003 - Industrial property |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 77
Page 21
... parties using identical or similar signs in circumstances where that use was not such as to indicate origin or is it limited so as to prevent only use which wholly or in part does indicate origin ? 7. Is use of an allegedly infringing ...
... parties using identical or similar signs in circumstances where that use was not such as to indicate origin or is it limited so as to prevent only use which wholly or in part does indicate origin ? 7. Is use of an allegedly infringing ...
Page 409
... parties . He should decide the dispute on the basis of the submissions before him and if he concludes , subsequent to the hearing , that there has been a decision which might be material to the questions he has to decide , then he must ...
... parties . He should decide the dispute on the basis of the submissions before him and if he concludes , subsequent to the hearing , that there has been a decision which might be material to the questions he has to decide , then he must ...
Page 417
... parties to draw to the court's attention a fact or point of law that was plainly relevant ; or discovery of new facts subsequent to the judgment being given . Another good reason was if the applicant could argue that he was taken by ...
... parties to draw to the court's attention a fact or point of law that was plainly relevant ; or discovery of new facts subsequent to the judgment being given . Another good reason was if the applicant could argue that he was taken by ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
ALBERTA FERRETTI amendment Amgen amino acid Appointed Person Arsenal FC Arsenal Football Club burner cell claim 19 claimant colour common general knowledge contact lens CooperVision Court of Appeal cross-examination Davies decision defendants Directive distinctive character DNA sequence dots earlier trade mark effect erythropoietin European Patent evidence filed gene hearing officer High Court Inc v Transkaryotic infringement Integer inventive step iris section issue judge judgment Kirin-Amgen Inc lenses likelihood of confusion Ltd's Trade Mark Marks Act 1994 Meneghetti non-use opponent paragraph numbers paras Patent Office Philips Electronics NV Plc v Reed prior art priority date protein question Quickfit reason Reed Business Information referred registered trade mark registrar relation relevant Remington Consumer Products revocation shape Silverleaf specification submissions Sweet & Maxwell Synthon third party TORRES TRADE MARK 2003 Trade Mark Application trade mark proprietor Trade Marks Act Transkaryotic Therapies Inc uEPO United Kingdom word