Reports of Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Cases, Issues 1-5; Issues 8-13Published at the Patent Office Sales Branch, 2003 - Industrial property |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 27
Page 288
... period of three months from the expiry of the five - year period , this being apparent from the wording of s.46 ( 3 ) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 which referred to that period as commencing after the expiry of the five - year period and ...
... period of three months from the expiry of the five - year period , this being apparent from the wording of s.46 ( 3 ) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 which referred to that period as commencing after the expiry of the five - year period and ...
Page 291
... period that was required under s.26 . " Mr Arnold Q.C. for the claimant supports the Master's reasoning . He argues that Mr Edenborough's argument involves an over - fine textual analysis which is inappropriate when interpreting ...
... period that was required under s.26 . " Mr Arnold Q.C. for the claimant supports the Master's reasoning . He argues that Mr Edenborough's argument involves an over - fine textual analysis which is inappropriate when interpreting ...
Page 297
... period from autumn 1999 , when the negotiations with Procter & Gamble commenced , to the expiry of the five - year period . Mr Arnold supports the Master's conclusion in relation to the period prior to autumn 1999 . Mr Edenborough ...
... period from autumn 1999 , when the negotiations with Procter & Gamble commenced , to the expiry of the five - year period . Mr Arnold supports the Master's conclusion in relation to the period prior to autumn 1999 . Mr Edenborough ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
ALBERTA FERRETTI amendment Amgen amino acid Appointed Person Arsenal FC Arsenal Football Club burner cell claim 19 claimant colour common general knowledge contact lens CooperVision Court of Appeal cross-examination Davies decision defendants Directive distinctive character DNA sequence dots earlier trade mark effect erythropoietin European Patent evidence filed gene hearing officer High Court Inc v Transkaryotic infringement Integer inventive step iris section issue judge judgment Kirin-Amgen Inc lenses likelihood of confusion Ltd's Trade Mark Marks Act 1994 Meneghetti non-use opponent paragraph numbers paras Patent Office Philips Electronics NV Plc v Reed prior art priority date protein question Quickfit reason Reed Business Information referred registered trade mark registrar relation relevant Remington Consumer Products revocation shape Silverleaf specification submissions Sweet & Maxwell Synthon third party TORRES TRADE MARK 2003 Trade Mark Application trade mark proprietor Trade Marks Act Transkaryotic Therapies Inc uEPO United Kingdom word