Reports of Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Cases, Issues 1-5; Issues 8-13Published at the Patent Office Sales Branch, 2003 - Industrial property |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 90
Page 157
... referred by the High Court , which is , moreover , the key to the case which it has to decide . And here I am going to take a path in the opposite direction to the one I followed in proposing an answer to the first question referred ...
... referred by the High Court , which is , moreover , the key to the case which it has to decide . And here I am going to take a path in the opposite direction to the one I followed in proposing an answer to the first question referred ...
Page 321
... referred to in Art . 10 ( 2 ) included their trade marks rights in the same way as it included their copyrights . ( para . [ 41 ] ) Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd. [ 2001 ] H.R.L.R. 57 , [ 2001 ] 4 All E.R. 666 ; [ 2002 ] R.P.C. 5 , CA ...
... referred to in Art . 10 ( 2 ) included their trade marks rights in the same way as it included their copyrights . ( para . [ 41 ] ) Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd. [ 2001 ] H.R.L.R. 57 , [ 2001 ] 4 All E.R. 666 ; [ 2002 ] R.P.C. 5 , CA ...
Page 356
... referred to as the Urbach glitter lens . Also cited was a United States design patent issued at that time , which consisted of the statement " The ornamental design for contact lens or similar article , substantially as shown and ...
... referred to as the Urbach glitter lens . Also cited was a United States design patent issued at that time , which consisted of the statement " The ornamental design for contact lens or similar article , substantially as shown and ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
ALBERTA FERRETTI amendment Amgen amino acid Appointed Person Arsenal FC Arsenal Football Club burner cell claim 19 claimant colour common general knowledge contact lens CooperVision Court of Appeal cross-examination Davies decision defendants Directive distinctive character DNA sequence dots earlier trade mark effect erythropoietin European Patent evidence filed gene hearing officer High Court Inc v Transkaryotic infringement Integer inventive step iris section issue judge judgment Kirin-Amgen Inc lenses likelihood of confusion Ltd's Trade Mark Marks Act 1994 Meneghetti non-use opponent paragraph numbers paras Patent Office Philips Electronics NV Plc v Reed prior art priority date protein question Quickfit reason Reed Business Information referred registered trade mark registrar relation relevant Remington Consumer Products revocation shape Silverleaf specification submissions Sweet & Maxwell Synthon third party TORRES TRADE MARK 2003 Trade Mark Application trade mark proprietor Trade Marks Act Transkaryotic Therapies Inc uEPO United Kingdom word