Reports of Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Cases, Issues 1-5; Issues 8-13Published at the Patent Office Sales Branch, 2003 - Industrial property |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 43
Page 55
... submitted , established that a product - by - process claim can only be novel if the product itself was novel . Novelty , he submitted , could not be conferred by the process limitations themselves . That position was , he submitted ...
... submitted , established that a product - by - process claim can only be novel if the product itself was novel . Novelty , he submitted , could not be conferred by the process limitations themselves . That position was , he submitted ...
Page 87
... submitted that the judge had erred in considering the specification as a whole . He submitted that if part of it had not been drafted with reasonable skill and knowledge , then the patentee could not discharge the burden of proof . That ...
... submitted that the judge had erred in considering the specification as a whole . He submitted that if part of it had not been drafted with reasonable skill and knowledge , then the patentee could not discharge the burden of proof . That ...
Page 123
... submitted that the judge had fallen into error by not taking sufficient account of the purpose of Art.54 ( 3 ) and s.2 ( 3 ) and also the history behind them . He submitted that Art.54 ( 3 ) was concerned with avoidance of double ...
... submitted that the judge had fallen into error by not taking sufficient account of the purpose of Art.54 ( 3 ) and s.2 ( 3 ) and also the history behind them . He submitted that Art.54 ( 3 ) was concerned with avoidance of double ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
ALBERTA FERRETTI amendment Amgen amino acid Appointed Person Arsenal FC Arsenal Football Club burner cell claim 19 claimant colour common general knowledge contact lens CooperVision Court of Appeal cross-examination Davies decision defendants Directive distinctive character DNA sequence dots earlier trade mark effect erythropoietin European Patent evidence filed gene hearing officer High Court Inc v Transkaryotic infringement Integer inventive step iris section issue judge judgment Kirin-Amgen Inc lenses likelihood of confusion Ltd's Trade Mark Marks Act 1994 Meneghetti non-use opponent paragraph numbers paras Patent Office Philips Electronics NV Plc v Reed prior art priority date protein question Quickfit reason Reed Business Information referred registered trade mark registrar relation relevant Remington Consumer Products revocation shape Silverleaf specification submissions Sweet & Maxwell Synthon third party TORRES TRADE MARK 2003 Trade Mark Application trade mark proprietor Trade Marks Act Transkaryotic Therapies Inc uEPO United Kingdom word