The American Journal of International Law, Volume 34American Society of International Law, 1940 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 68
Page 54
Although the United States refused to recognize the Huerta administra- tion in Mexico in 1913 , it kept its embassy open . In United States ( Geo . W. Hopkins Claim ) v . United Mexican States , the U. S. - Mexican General Claims ...
Although the United States refused to recognize the Huerta administra- tion in Mexico in 1913 , it kept its embassy open . In United States ( Geo . W. Hopkins Claim ) v . United Mexican States , the U. S. - Mexican General Claims ...
Page 236
To anyone who believes with Seward that the interest of the United States lies in enlarging neutral rather than belligerent rights , a review of Civil War precedents and their fate gives a limited measure of satisfaction . The United ...
To anyone who believes with Seward that the interest of the United States lies in enlarging neutral rather than belligerent rights , a review of Civil War precedents and their fate gives a limited measure of satisfaction . The United ...
Page 428
... United States to the Canal Zone was hypercritical . " 32 With this the matter may be left . The United States has adequate title and majestas to support the enactment and enforcement of all laws , orders , regulations and rules ...
... United States to the Canal Zone was hypercritical . " 32 With this the matter may be left . The United States has adequate title and majestas to support the enactment and enforcement of all laws , orders , regulations and rules ...
Contents
SABOTAGE CLAIMS AGAINST GERMANY L H Woolsey | 23 |
REVISION OF NATIONALITY LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES Richard W Flournoy | 36 |
RELATIONS OFFICIEUSES AND INTENT TO RECOGNIZE Herbert W Briggs | 47 |
Copyright | |
28 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agency agent agreement application arbitration armed Article Belgian belligerent Britain British Government Canal Zone China claim Commission Conference Congress Constitution contraband Convention coöperation Council countries decision declaration diplomatic doctrine duties economic enemy established Executive existence fact force foreign France French German Grotius Hague Hay-Pauncefote Treaty hostilities Ibid Index interests international law Japan JOURNAL July June June 15 June 21 jurisdiction justice League of Nations legislation London Majesty's Government March ment military Monroe Doctrine naval neutral Neutrality Act obligations Office opinion Pact Panama Canal parties peace persons political ports present President principles problem proclamation protection provisions question Quincy Wright Ratification recognized regard regulations relations rules Santa Monica Bay Secretary Senate Sept ship Society sovereignty Stat status Supp supra territorial waters Text tion treaty Treaty Series United vessels violation Washington York