The American Journal of International Law, Volume 34American Society of International Law, 1940 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 80
Page 24
... Agent , who re- fused to produce them , and many of the other documents , including the reports and the accounts of German Agents in the United States , had been destroyed as compromising . It is true , the American Agent said , that ...
... Agent , who re- fused to produce them , and many of the other documents , including the reports and the accounts of German Agents in the United States , had been destroyed as compromising . It is true , the American Agent said , that ...
Page 156
... Agent's sugges- tion that Mr. Osborn be employed by the Commission . Mr. Osborn himself is unwilling ; the American Agent now objects ; the German Agent's consent is subject to restrictions , and the Commission could not accept ...
... Agent's sugges- tion that Mr. Osborn be employed by the Commission . Mr. Osborn himself is unwilling ; the American Agent now objects ; the German Agent's consent is subject to restrictions , and the Commission could not accept ...
Page 654
... agent or for the common benefit of the agent and the principal , in the great majority of cases it is , from the viewpoint of legal advantage , for the benefit of the principal . The examples given in the preceding paragraphs prove that ...
... agent or for the common benefit of the agent and the principal , in the great majority of cases it is , from the viewpoint of legal advantage , for the benefit of the principal . The examples given in the preceding paragraphs prove that ...
Contents
SABOTAGE CLAIMS AGAINST GERMANY L H Woolsey | 23 |
REVISION OF NATIONALITY LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES Richard W Flournoy | 36 |
RELATIONS OFFICIEUSES AND INTENT TO RECOGNIZE Herbert W Briggs | 47 |
Copyright | |
28 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agency agent agreement application arbitration armed Article Belgian belligerent Britain British Government Canal Zone China claim Commission Conference Congress Constitution contraband Convention coöperation Council countries decision declaration diplomatic doctrine duties economic enemy established Executive existence fact force foreign France French German Grotius Hague Hay-Pauncefote Treaty hostilities Ibid Index interests international law Japan JOURNAL July June June 15 June 21 jurisdiction justice League of Nations legislation London Majesty's Government March ment military Monroe Doctrine naval neutral Neutrality Act obligations Office opinion Pact Panama Canal parties peace persons political ports present President principles problem proclamation protection provisions question Quincy Wright Ratification recognized regard regulations relations rules Santa Monica Bay Secretary Senate Sept ship Society sovereignty Stat status Supp supra territorial waters Text tion treaty Treaty Series United vessels violation Washington York