The American Journal of International Law, Volume 34American Society of International Law, 1940 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 73
Page 7
... concluded accepting the compulsory jurisdiction is evidence that the contracting Parties intended to open up new ways of access to the Court rather than to close old ways or to allow them to cancel each other out with the ultimate ...
... concluded accepting the compulsory jurisdiction is evidence that the contracting Parties intended to open up new ways of access to the Court rather than to close old ways or to allow them to cancel each other out with the ultimate ...
Page 495
... concluded that al- though the legality of conquest is being seriously challenged , in view of the general acquiescence of states in recent conquests , it must be concluded that the old rule that conquest conveys valid title has not yet ...
... concluded that al- though the legality of conquest is being seriously challenged , in view of the general acquiescence of states in recent conquests , it must be concluded that the old rule that conquest conveys valid title has not yet ...
Page 667
... concluded in futuro.52 The law of February 9 , 1909,5 on the importation and use of opium was enacted to give the United States " clean hands " on the Shanghai Opium Commission ( 1909 ) .54 Two acts were adopted in 1912 55 before and ...
... concluded in futuro.52 The law of February 9 , 1909,5 on the importation and use of opium was enacted to give the United States " clean hands " on the Shanghai Opium Commission ( 1909 ) .54 Two acts were adopted in 1912 55 before and ...
Contents
SABOTAGE CLAIMS AGAINST GERMANY L H Woolsey | 23 |
REVISION OF NATIONALITY LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES Richard W Flournoy | 36 |
RELATIONS OFFICIEUSES AND INTENT TO RECOGNIZE Herbert W Briggs | 47 |
Copyright | |
28 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agency agent agreement application arbitration armed Article Belgian belligerent Britain British Government Canal Zone China claim Commission Conference Congress Constitution contraband Convention coöperation Council countries decision declaration diplomatic doctrine duties economic enemy established Executive existence fact force foreign France French German Grotius Hague Hay-Pauncefote Treaty hostilities Ibid Index interests international law Japan JOURNAL July June June 15 June 21 jurisdiction justice League of Nations legislation London Majesty's Government March ment military Monroe Doctrine naval neutral Neutrality Act obligations Office opinion Pact Panama Canal parties peace persons political ports present President principles problem proclamation protection provisions question Quincy Wright Ratification recognized regard regulations relations rules Santa Monica Bay Secretary Senate Sept ship Society sovereignty Stat status Supp supra territorial waters Text tion treaty Treaty Series United vessels violation Washington York