The American Journal of International Law, Volume 57American Society of International Law, 1963 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 78
Page 423
... opinion on the question submitted to it , this Assembly would not necessarily accept any particular argument or implication of the Court's opinion . It would neither commend nor criticize the Court on its reasoning . This is no more our ...
... opinion on the question submitted to it , this Assembly would not necessarily accept any particular argument or implication of the Court's opinion . It would neither commend nor criticize the Court on its reasoning . This is no more our ...
Page 424
... opinions . My dele- gation holds the view that an advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice - this Organization's " principal judicial organ ” —is authoritative . This is the view which this Assembly has adopted in the past ...
... opinions . My dele- gation holds the view that an advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice - this Organization's " principal judicial organ ” —is authoritative . This is the view which this Assembly has adopted in the past ...
Page 426
... opinion , it is the opinion of the Court , whatever its majority . But it may be of interest to note that the majorities in the prior nine cases sometimes have been larger and sometimes smaller than that in the opinion before us . The ...
... opinion , it is the opinion of the Court , whatever its majority . But it may be of interest to note that the majorities in the prior nine cases sometimes have been larger and sometimes smaller than that in the opinion before us . The ...
Contents
REFLECTIONS UPON THE POLITICAL OFFENSE IN INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE Alona | 1 |
VOL 57 | 2 |
THE LEGAL STATUS OF FORMOSA J P Jain | 25 |
Copyright | |
41 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted action adopted agreement Algerian American application arbitration Article Assembly authority British subjects Bulgaria China claims Commission Committee Commonwealth Communist concerning Conference constitute Convention countries Court of Justice Cuba Cuban decision Declaration defense depositary Detaining Power diplomatic disarmament dispute draft economic effect established European extradition force foreign Formosa French Geneva Geneva Convention German Government Hague Ibid International Court international law International Law Commission jurisdiction Laos League of Nations legislation Mandate ment military national law negotiations Netherlands nuclear obligations offense Office opinion organization paragraph parties peace political present President principles prisoners prisoners of war problem procedure Professor Protocol provisions purpose quarantine question Quincy Wright ratification referred regard relations Republic reservation resolution rule Security Council self-defense ship sovereignty Soviet Union space law status Taiwan territory tion treaty Treaty Series Tribunal United Kingdom United Nations Charter violation World