The old definition of negligence stated and considered in the light of the 484 492 The law with regard to actions for deceit to a great extent settled by the decisions of the House of Lords in Smith v. Chadwick, decided in 1888, and Derry v. Peek, decided in 1889-Statement of the facts in Smith v. Chadwick, and of the law as laid down in the House or Lords with regard to what the Plaintiff must prove in order to succeed in an action for deceit-Statement of the facts in Derry v. Peek-State- ment as to how an action for deceit differs essentially from an action brought to obtain rescission of a contract on the ground of misrepre- sentation of a material fact-Summary of the law with regard to The various modes in which torts may be discharged considered-The rule Actio personalis moritur cum personâ―The exceptions to this rule stated and considered-Does the maxim apply to an action brought in respect of breach of promise of marriage?-The Statute of Limitations as to periods within which actions must be brought for slander, assault, battery, wounding, imprisonment, trespass to lands or to goods, detinue, trover, replevin, libel, &c.—Accord and satisfac- tion-Waiver―The position of bankrupt tort feasors and that of persons injured by torts who become bankrupt considered-Discharge of tort by the recovery of damages-Important distinction between contracts and torts in reference to damages-The various kinds of damages awarded to parties injured by torts considered and illustrated (1) Nominal damages (2) Ordinary damages-(3) Vindictive or exemplary damages-(4) Special damages-The question of measure TABLE OF CASES. A. A. B., in the Matter of (11 P. D. 56) A. v. B (1 P. & D. 559) . A.'s Divorce Bill (12 App. Cas. 365, 366) Abbott, Ex parte. Re Gourlay (15 Ch. D. 456; 50 L. J. Ch. 80; v. Middleton (7 H. L. Cas. 68) Aberdeen Railway v. Blaikie (1 Macq. 461) 1047 774 521 40 Aberdeen Town Council v. Aberdeen University (2 App. Cas. 544, Abrath v. North-Eastern Railway Co. (11 Q. B. D. 440; 11 321 958; 54 L. T. 641; 32 W. R. 50; 34 W. R. 63) Ackroyd v. Smithson (1 Bro. C. C. 503) Adam v. Newbiggin (13 App. Cas. 308) Adams, Re and The Kensington Vestry (27 Ch. D. 394) v. Angell (5 Ch. D. 634, 645; 46 L. J. Ch. 31; 43 L. T. Ager v, Peninsular and Oriental Steamship Co. (26 Ch. D. 637) Agnew v. Murray (9 App. Cas. 519) . v. Usher (14 Q. B. D. 78) Agriculturist Cattle Insurance Co. Baird's Case (L. R. 5 Ch. 725). 619 Ainslie, Re. Swinburne v. Ainslie (30 Ch. D. 485; 33 W. R. 910) Alexander v. Mackenzie (9 Scotch Sess. Cas., 2nd series, 758). PAGE 322 656 1059, 1089 1017 103 Alison, In re. Johnson v. Mounsey (11 Ch. D. 284; 40 L. T. 234; 27 W. R. 389) Allbutt v. General Council of Medical Education (23 Q. B. D. 400). 470 Allcard v. Skinner (36 Ch. D. 145; 56 L. J. Ch. 1052; 56 L. T. 104; 372; 21 W. R. 162) Allsop v. Wheatcroft (L. R. 15 Eq. 59; 42 L. J. Ch. 12; 27 L. T. Almada and Tirito Co., Re (38 Ch. D. 415) Alston, Ex parte (L. R. 4 Ch. 168) Amalia, The (1 Moo. P. C. C. (N.S.) 471; Br. & Lush, 151) . Amos v. Chadwick (9 Ch. D. 459, 463; 47 L. J. Ch. 607; 38 L. T. 755 . 1057 742 292 800, 801 427 660 923 v. Swansea Cambrian Building Society (50 L. J. 428) Andrews, Re (7 Ch. D. 635) Anglo-African Steamship Co., Re (32 Ch. D. 348; 55 L. J. Ch. 579; 54 L. T. 807; 34 W. R. 554) Anglo-Italian Bank v. Davies (9 Ch. D. 275; 47 L. J. Ch. 833; 39 Armitage, Ex parte. Re Learoyd & Co. (17 Ch. D. 13) Armory v. Delamirie (1 Strange, 504; 1 Smith's L. C. 385). Arnold v. Dixon (L. R. 19 Eq. 113) Ashbury v. Riche (L. R. 7 H. L. 653) Ashby v. White (2 Ld. Raymond, 938; 1 Smith L. C. 429) Ashcroft, Re (19 Q. B. D. 186) Asher t. Calcraft (18 Q. B. D. 607) Ashley, In the Goods of Anne (15 P. D. 120) Ashton v. Corrigan (L. R. 13 Eq. 76). v. Sharrock (29 W. R. 117) Ashwin, Re (25 Q. B. D. 271). . Ashworth, Ex parte. Re Hoare (L. R. 18 Eq. 705) 927 1141 494, 496 545 ―v. Outram (5 Ch. D. 941; 46 L. J. Ch. 687; 36 L. T. 200; 25 W. R. 862) 212 590 71 713, 775 154 Aslatt v. Corporation of Southampton (16 Ch. D. 143; 50 L. J. Ch. 31; 43 L. T. 464; 29 W. R. 117) Astley v. Earl of Essex (L. R. 18 Eq. 290) (25 Q. B. D. 377) Atlantic Mutual Assurance Co. v. North (16 Ch. D. 474, 481) Attorney-General v. Abdy (1 H. & C. 266). 434, 987 of Hong Kong v. Kwok-a-Sing (5 P. C. 179, 199) 1176 v. Hubback (10 Q. B. D. 488; 13 Q. B. D. 275) v. Ironmongers' Co. (2 Beav. 313) v. Jones (1 Mac. & G. 574) W.R. 737; 57 L. J. Q. B. 83: 58 L. T. 192) |