Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1905 - Copyright "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
... Rule 157 to use the present testimony . That rule fixes the conditions under which the motion may be granted . The petition is denied . MEYERS V. TYDEN . Decided December 3 , 1903 . ( 108 O. G. , 287. ) 1. INTERFERENCE - AMENDMENT UNDER ...
... Rule 157 to use the present testimony . That rule fixes the conditions under which the motion may be granted . The petition is denied . MEYERS V. TYDEN . Decided December 3 , 1903 . ( 108 O. G. , 287. ) 1. INTERFERENCE - AMENDMENT UNDER ...
Page 25
... Rule 40 of the Rules of Practice requires the full name of the inventor to be signed to the specification . The rule makes no provi- sion for the insertion of honorable titles , and however well the iden- tity of an individual may be ...
... Rule 40 of the Rules of Practice requires the full name of the inventor to be signed to the specification . The rule makes no provi- sion for the insertion of honorable titles , and however well the iden- tity of an individual may be ...
Page 35
... Rule 123 provides in part as follows : The filing of motions will not operate as a stay of proceedings in any case . To effect this , motion should be made before the tribunal having jurisdiction of the interference , who will ...
... Rule 123 provides in part as follows : The filing of motions will not operate as a stay of proceedings in any case . To effect this , motion should be made before the tribunal having jurisdiction of the interference , who will ...
Page 53
... rules , this case became abandoned Sept. 10 , 1903 . It is from this action that the present petition is taken . Rule 67 provides that— 67. Whenever in the treatment of an ex parte application , an adverse decision is made upon any ...
... rules , this case became abandoned Sept. 10 , 1903 . It is from this action that the present petition is taken . Rule 67 provides that— 67. Whenever in the treatment of an ex parte application , an adverse decision is made upon any ...
Page 55
... rule or decision of a court that makes it mandatory upon an applicant for reissue to file his application within two years from the date of the patent , and I cannot see any material benefit to be obtained by applicant by having the ...
... rule or decision of a court that makes it mandatory upon an applicant for reissue to file his application within two years from the date of the patent , and I cannot see any material benefit to be obtained by applicant by having the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abandoned above-entitled action affidavit affirmed alleged ALLEN amendment apparatus APPEAL ON MOTION appellee assignment attorney awarding priority claims Commissioner of Patents Company conceived the invention conception considered constructive reduction counts Court of Appeals decision declared delay device diligence disclosed the invention disclosure divisional application drawing embodied entitled evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiner's Examiners-in-Chief Exhibit ference filed his application final rejection ground Held interference in fact interference proceeding invention to practice inventor inventorship issue June junior party limit of appeal machine magnetomotive force matter mechanism merely merits Messrs motion for dissolution motion to dissolve operation original Patent Office permitted petitioner preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention proceedings prosecution question of priority reason record reduction to practice referred refusing registered requirement for division Rule September September 15 September 24 shown specification statute substantially taken taking testimony testifies thereof tion trade-mark treadle tribunals witnesses
Popular passages
Page 613 - That he had surreptitiously or unjustly obtained the patent for that which was in fact invented by another, who was using reasonable diligence in adapting and perfecting the same; or, Third.
Page 580 - ... to the entire exclusion of the exercise by the Republic of Panama of any such sovereign rights, power or authority.
Page 218 - No person otherwise entitled thereto shall be debarred from receiving a patent for his invention or discovery, nor shall any patent be declared invalid by reason of its having been first patented or caused to be patented by the inventor or his legal representatives. or assigns in a foreign country, unless the application for said foreign patent was filed more than twelve months...
Page 722 - No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it. It is the only supreme power in our system of government, and every man who by accepting office participates in its functions is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes upon the exercise of...
Page 707 - ... may, upon payment of the fees required by law, and other due proceeding had, obtain a patent therefor.
Page 706 - The Commissioner of Patents, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, may from time to time establish regulations, not inconsistent with law, for the conduct of proceedings in the Patent Office.
Page 707 - ... not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country before bis invention or discovery thereof or more than two years prior to his application...
Page 580 - The Republic of Panama grants to the United States in perpetuity the use, occupation and control of a zone of land and land under water for the construction, maintenance, operation, sanitation and protection of said Canal...
Page 721 - This right being clearly established, we are told that the court can proceed no further, because it appears that certain military officers, acting under the orders of the president, have seized this estate, and converted one part of it into a military fort and another into a cemetery.
Page 712 - The examiners-in-chief shall be persons of competent" legal knowledge and scientific ability, whose duty it shall be, on the written petition of the appellant, to revise and determine upon the validity of the adverse decisions of examiners upon applications for patents, and for reissues of patents, and in interference cases : and when required by the Commissioner, they shall hear and report upon claims for extensions, and perform such other like duties as he may assign them.