Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1905 - Copyright "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 5
... clear that the Examiner's action is in conformity with the rul- ings in ex parte Faxon , ( C. D. , 1903 , 118 ; 103 ... clearly the extent of a single trade - mark right . The right to pursue an infringer extends no farther than to ...
... clear that the Examiner's action is in conformity with the rul- ings in ex parte Faxon , ( C. D. , 1903 , 118 ; 103 ... clearly the extent of a single trade - mark right . The right to pursue an infringer extends no farther than to ...
Page 15
... clear error . The Office should not conduct an interference and possibly issue a patent to Robin if there is a clear bar to the grant to him . The Examiner will grant a rehearing upon the motion to dissolve and consider the French ...
... clear error . The Office should not conduct an interference and possibly issue a patent to Robin if there is a clear bar to the grant to him . The Examiner will grant a rehearing upon the motion to dissolve and consider the French ...
Page 27
... clear conception of this invention . The suggestion by the applicants that the Examiner's objection should not be insisted upon , simply because one skilled in the art could make the invention from the present disclosure , does not over ...
... clear conception of this invention . The suggestion by the applicants that the Examiner's objection should not be insisted upon , simply because one skilled in the art could make the invention from the present disclosure , does not over ...
Page 49
United States. Patent Office. Examiner is clearly right . The prosecution of the case was closed before him at least as early as the official action of September 19 , 1902 , wherein it was made clear to applicant that he , the Examiner ...
United States. Patent Office. Examiner is clearly right . The prosecution of the case was closed before him at least as early as the official action of September 19 , 1902 , wherein it was made clear to applicant that he , the Examiner ...
Page 64
... clear , such limitation will be made before any action upon the merits ; otherwise it may be made at any time before final action thereon , in the discretion of the Examiner . It is held , therefore , that this requirement though late ...
... clear , such limitation will be made before any action upon the merits ; otherwise it may be made at any time before final action thereon , in the discretion of the Examiner . It is held , therefore , that this requirement though late ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abandoned above-entitled action affidavit affirmed alleged ALLEN amendment apparatus APPEAL ON MOTION appellee assignment attorney awarding priority claims Commissioner of Patents Company conceived the invention conception considered constructive reduction counts Court of Appeals decision declared delay device diligence disclosed the invention disclosure divisional application drawing embodied entitled evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiner's Examiners-in-Chief Exhibit ference filed his application final rejection ground Held interference in fact interference proceeding invention to practice inventor inventorship issue June junior party limit of appeal machine magnetomotive force matter mechanism merely merits Messrs motion for dissolution motion to dissolve operation original Patent Office permitted petitioner preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention proceedings prosecution question of priority reason record reduction to practice referred refusing registered requirement for division Rule September September 15 September 24 shown specification statute substantially taken taking testimony testifies thereof tion trade-mark treadle tribunals witnesses
Popular passages
Page 613 - That he had surreptitiously or unjustly obtained the patent for that which was in fact invented by another, who was using reasonable diligence in adapting and perfecting the same; or, Third.
Page 580 - ... to the entire exclusion of the exercise by the Republic of Panama of any such sovereign rights, power or authority.
Page 218 - No person otherwise entitled thereto shall be debarred from receiving a patent for his invention or discovery, nor shall any patent be declared invalid by reason of its having been first patented or caused to be patented by the inventor or his legal representatives. or assigns in a foreign country, unless the application for said foreign patent was filed more than twelve months...
Page 722 - No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it. It is the only supreme power in our system of government, and every man who by accepting office participates in its functions is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes upon the exercise of...
Page 707 - ... may, upon payment of the fees required by law, and other due proceeding had, obtain a patent therefor.
Page 706 - The Commissioner of Patents, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, may from time to time establish regulations, not inconsistent with law, for the conduct of proceedings in the Patent Office.
Page 707 - ... not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country before bis invention or discovery thereof or more than two years prior to his application...
Page 580 - The Republic of Panama grants to the United States in perpetuity the use, occupation and control of a zone of land and land under water for the construction, maintenance, operation, sanitation and protection of said Canal...
Page 721 - This right being clearly established, we are told that the court can proceed no further, because it appears that certain military officers, acting under the orders of the president, have seized this estate, and converted one part of it into a military fort and another into a cemetery.
Page 712 - The examiners-in-chief shall be persons of competent" legal knowledge and scientific ability, whose duty it shall be, on the written petition of the appellant, to revise and determine upon the validity of the adverse decisions of examiners upon applications for patents, and for reissues of patents, and in interference cases : and when required by the Commissioner, they shall hear and report upon claims for extensions, and perform such other like duties as he may assign them.