Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1905 - Copyright "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 63
Page 28
... contend , however , that the particular goods on which they use the trade - mark is " Holland Schiedam Geneva , " and as it has not been shown that Vanden Bergh & Company has used the mark on this particular variety of goods they ...
... contend , however , that the particular goods on which they use the trade - mark is " Holland Schiedam Geneva , " and as it has not been shown that Vanden Bergh & Company has used the mark on this particular variety of goods they ...
Page 65
... contends that they should be allowed to remain in the same application because they belong , in the same class of invention in the present scheme of Office classification . The question of Office classification is not and has never been ...
... contends that they should be allowed to remain in the same application because they belong , in the same class of invention in the present scheme of Office classification . The question of Office classification is not and has never been ...
Page 68
... contends that this device is a reduction to practice of the invention in issue ; but this contention is not thought to be sound . In the first place , the pin - tongue and the pin forming the pivot are too long to permit of the device ...
... contends that this device is a reduction to practice of the invention in issue ; but this contention is not thought to be sound . In the first place , the pin - tongue and the pin forming the pivot are too long to permit of the device ...
Page 71
... contends that this practice is wrong and that the patent should issue in accordance with the assignment of earliest date . She argues that the first assignee has the prima facie right and that the Office should be guided in its action ...
... contends that this practice is wrong and that the patent should issue in accordance with the assignment of earliest date . She argues that the first assignee has the prima facie right and that the Office should be guided in its action ...
Page 78
... contends that in view of the facts that he was one of the joint applicants of the application filed August 29 , 1902 , and as the letter abandoning this application states that the joint applicants believe him to be the sole inventor of ...
... contends that in view of the facts that he was one of the joint applicants of the application filed August 29 , 1902 , and as the letter abandoning this application states that the joint applicants believe him to be the sole inventor of ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abandoned above-entitled action affidavit affirmed alleged ALLEN amendment apparatus APPEAL ON MOTION appellee assignment attorney awarding priority claims Commissioner of Patents Company conceived the invention conception considered constructive reduction counts Court of Appeals decision declared delay device diligence disclosed the invention disclosure divisional application drawing embodied entitled evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiner's Examiners-in-Chief Exhibit ference filed his application final rejection ground Held interference in fact interference proceeding invention to practice inventor inventorship issue June junior party limit of appeal machine magnetomotive force matter mechanism merely merits Messrs motion for dissolution motion to dissolve operation original Patent Office permitted petitioner preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention proceedings prosecution question of priority reason record reduction to practice referred refusing registered requirement for division Rule September September 15 September 24 shown specification statute substantially taken taking testimony testifies thereof tion trade-mark treadle tribunals witnesses
Popular passages
Page 613 - That he had surreptitiously or unjustly obtained the patent for that which was in fact invented by another, who was using reasonable diligence in adapting and perfecting the same; or, Third.
Page 580 - ... to the entire exclusion of the exercise by the Republic of Panama of any such sovereign rights, power or authority.
Page 218 - No person otherwise entitled thereto shall be debarred from receiving a patent for his invention or discovery, nor shall any patent be declared invalid by reason of its having been first patented or caused to be patented by the inventor or his legal representatives. or assigns in a foreign country, unless the application for said foreign patent was filed more than twelve months...
Page 722 - No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it. It is the only supreme power in our system of government, and every man who by accepting office participates in its functions is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes upon the exercise of...
Page 707 - ... may, upon payment of the fees required by law, and other due proceeding had, obtain a patent therefor.
Page 706 - The Commissioner of Patents, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, may from time to time establish regulations, not inconsistent with law, for the conduct of proceedings in the Patent Office.
Page 707 - ... not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country before bis invention or discovery thereof or more than two years prior to his application...
Page 580 - The Republic of Panama grants to the United States in perpetuity the use, occupation and control of a zone of land and land under water for the construction, maintenance, operation, sanitation and protection of said Canal...
Page 721 - This right being clearly established, we are told that the court can proceed no further, because it appears that certain military officers, acting under the orders of the president, have seized this estate, and converted one part of it into a military fort and another into a cemetery.
Page 712 - The examiners-in-chief shall be persons of competent" legal knowledge and scientific ability, whose duty it shall be, on the written petition of the appellant, to revise and determine upon the validity of the adverse decisions of examiners upon applications for patents, and for reissues of patents, and in interference cases : and when required by the Commissioner, they shall hear and report upon claims for extensions, and perform such other like duties as he may assign them.