The Law of Evidence in Civil Cases, Volume 1

Front Cover
Bancroft-Whitney, 1896 - Civil procedure - 2198 pages

From inside the book

Contents

891 No privilege if testimony cannot be used to convict
38
818
40
Mistake
41
Presumptions as to the mailing and receipt of letters
46
Presumption that men know the consequences of their
50
767
70
821
90
Same Telegrams Weight of the presumption
95
Presumptions of regularity in acts of private corpora tions
99
SameGeneral scope of the rule
103
Miscellaneous presumptions from the general course of business
104
Existence of governments Domestic and foreign
105
Foreign flags and seals State of war or peace
106
Territorial extent and subdivisions CountiesCities
107
CHAPTER III
108
sumption
109
Mere lapse of time less than twenty years not enough
135
Facts apparently collateral may become relevant
141
SameKnowledgeIntent
142
SameProof of other crimes than the one in issue
143
Same How limited
144
Collateral facts to show good faithKnowledge
145
Facts apparently collateral to repel the inference of accident
146
Character When relevant
147
Qualifications of the ruleLibel and slander
148
SameChanges in possession Possession by tenant
164
The presumption How rebutted
165
SameDisabilitiesNature of estate What facts are relevant
166
Presumptions as to the law of sister states 82 SameLimitations 83 SameForeign
168
Contracts presumed to be legal
174
Presumptions as to marriage
175
Cohabitation and reputation to concur Weight of pre
178
sumption
179
Presumption of marriage in civil and criminal issues
180
No presumption arising from illicit cohabitation
182
Other presumptions growing out of the marriage rela tion
183
SameOf coercion by the husband 91 SameNature and limits of the presumption
190
Presumptions of legitimacy
191
SameHow rebutted
194
SameConclusive if sexual intercourse between hus band and wife is shown 95 Relevant facts when sexual intercourse between husband and wife is n...
196
The husband or wife not allowed to deny sexual inter course
197
Sealed
200
SameTestamentary capacity Domicil Torts 899 Presumptions as to identity
202
Conflicting presumptions That of innocence prevails over other presumptions 101 SamePresumption of innocence of a party overcomes the presum...
207
cascoscos coccos coscoo
209
tions
211
State and subordinate officers 110 OfficersNotaries public 111 Official signatures and seals 112 Law of the forum International lawForeign trea ties ...
215
Effect of notice to produce
218
Object of notice to produceTime of giving
219
853 ImpeachmentExpressions of opinion Of hostility
243
ဘာဘာ
250
Admissions after dissolution of partnership
251
Partnership to be proved before admissions are re ceived
252
Admissions by joint contractors not partners
253
Declarations by persons having a mere community
254
Declarations by wrongdoersConspiracy
255
Courts Officers of the courtRecords Terms
256
SameEffect of such declarations
257
Admissions by attorneys
258
Same Effect of such admissions
259
Matters of history
260
SameDifferent actions or trials
261
Admissions of husband and wife
262
Facts relating to the currency
263
Geographical features
264
Admissions by persons referred
265
Effect of consenting to pay on condition an affidavit
266
Surveys Plats and streets
267
Declarations by persons acting in representative capac
268
Matters of science and
269
Admissions by private corporatious
270
Written admissions Letters
271
Invariable course of nature
272
Same Partnership books
273
Meaning of words and phrasesThe scriptures
274
Same continued
275
Abbreviations
276
Methods and customs of business
277
Facts not within the memory of the judge
278
SameWhere admissions are in good faith and by mistake
279
Facts of which jurors take judicial notice
280
Same The act must be calculated to mislead and act ually mislead
281
CHAPTER V
282
Proof of good character 157 Proof of financial standing Exemplary damages 158 Same Compensatory damages 159 SameFinancial standing of plai...
283
SameTitle subsequently acquired Mutuality
284
The whole statement or admission to be received
295
SameWritten admissions
296
Weight of admissions
297
Same continued
298
DefinitionHearsay evidenceReasons for its exclu sion
299
Illustrations of the rule
300
Hearsay may relate to what is done or written as well as what is spoken
301
Hearsay may include things stated under oath or against interest
302
Statements apparently hearsay may be original evi
303
dence 304 Matters of public and general interest
304
Illustrations of the rule
305
Distinction between public and merely general rights
306
Reputation as to private boundaries excluded in Eng land
307
308 SameRelaxation of the rule in the United States
308
309 Declarations as to particular facts concerning private boundaries not admissible
309
Declarations of surveyors
310
Maps relating to subjects of public or general interest
311
Ancient documents in support of ancient possession Their custody
312
SameDocuments to come from the proper custody
313
Declarations must have been made before the contro versy arose
314
Same Meaning of the rule Lis mota
315
316 Declarations as to pedigree Reason for the excep tion
316
SameDeclarants relationship How proved Par ticular facts
317
Are the declarations limited to cases where pedigree is the direct subject of the suit
318
Acts and conduct of relatives admissible as well as dec larations Written declarations
319
SameFamily recognition of writings and records
320
321 Weight of such testimony
321
Declarations only admissible after death of declarant
322
Entries in the course of business By deceased persons
323
Same Principle extended to declarations by persons still living
324
Recollection of the fact by the person making the entry
325
Entries by a party himself
326
Declarations of deceased persons against interest In general
327
Sufficient if the entries are prima facie against interest
328
coscoscos
329
Relevancy of disconnected facts to show defective ma chineryRailroad fires
339
Same continued
341
Facts apparently collateral Value of lands
343
Same continued
345
SameMixed questions of law and factConstruction of writings Statutes
363
The court decides questions of lawCriminal cases
369
cascascoscoo CHAPTER VI
370
Nature of the disqualifying interest
373
SameForm of pleadings
376
SamePlaintiff generally has the burdenExcep
378
tions
379
How affected by form of issueWhether affirmative or negative
380
Burden as to particular facts lying peculiarly within knowledge of a party
384
Expert testimony When valuable
394
Inspection by the jury Personal injury cases
400
Parties formerly incompetent witnesses
405
View The former practice
407
Statutes regulating view
408
View discretionary
409
When view may be granted
410
Is the view evidence in the case
411
Same continued
412
Experiments out of court
413
Models Diagrams Photographs
414
Grounds on which evidence is excluded by statute of frauds
415
As to the conveyance of interests in land
416
The statute as affecting leases
417
Proof of surrender of interests in land
418
Surrender by operation of
419
Cancellation of instruments creating interests in land
420
Trusts How proved Need not be created by writing
421
The trust to be proved by writing
422
Exception as to resulting trusts
423
193 Burden and weight of proof where crime is in issue
424
SameMode of proving the trust Amount of evidence
425
Statutes limiting resulting trusts
426
SameObject of the statute
427
Proof of trusts between those holding fiduciary relations
428
WillsProcuring devise by frauds
429
Proof of guaranty 431 Sale of goods
430
What the memorandum is to contain
432
Same continued
433
Subsequent modification by parol Fraud Mistake
434
ReformationPart performance
435
Same Original agreement must be proved
436
Parol evidence inadmissible to vary written instru ments Reasons for the rule
437
BEST EVIDENCE
438
Illustrations of sufficient notice 221 Requisites of notice 222 Notice to produce On whom served 223 Effect of nonproduction 224 When notice to p...
439
The rule does not prevent proof of fraud Sealed and unsealed instruments
440
Illegality of contract may be shown Incapacity
441
As to mistakes of factsReformation of contracts Mistakes as to dates
443
Proof of independent or collateral contracts
444
ontracts
445
SameCorporate acts
457
Same
465
ities
480
688 Same
484
one subject or person than another
487
Where there is no latent ambiguity declarations
490
Evidence to explain latent ambiguities in deeds
496
Parol evidence to explain receipts
502
privity
505
Indorsements on negotiable paper
508
Degrees of secondary evidence
518
30 SameCases illustrating the American rule
519
Crossexamination of witnesses as to writings
522
CHAPTER VIII
524
ments
531
Defective recordsEvidence for some purposes
533
Same continued
534
CHAPTER IX
538
Proof of attested documents Attesting witnesses
539
Qualifications as to mere general recitals qualifications of general rule 286 As between landlord and tenant coscoscoscos com coocoo
540
Statutes affecting proof of documents Recording acts
550
Exceptions to the rule that mere certificates are
557
Writings used for comparison must be shown to
568
754
570
Immaterial alterations Conflicting views
574
coocoocoocopcoscoo
580
cascascos
581
Admissibility of facts in histories
600
Judgments in civil cases no bar in criminal cases
606
Judgments admissible against third persons for inci dental purposes
607
Judgments against principals in actions against their sureties
608
SameOther classes of bonds
609
Judgments When admissible as against third persons who are liable to make indemnity
610
Judgment must be final
611
Finality of judgmentsMust be on the merits
612
Effect of nonsuit discontinuance or appeal
613
Conclusive only as to matters in issue
614
SameNo admission from silence at judicial proceed ings
615
Extrinsic evidence to identify the issue
616
Same continued
617
Proof that issues are the same Burden
618
Effect of judgment where cause of action is different
619
Effect of judgment General issue
620
Matters which might have been litigated in former suit
621
Same continued
622
Judgments in rem as evidence
623
SameJudgment of divorce
624
Same continued
625
Judgments in probate Conclusive effect of Proof of death
626
SameJurisdiction
627
Collateral proof to show want of jurisdiction
628
Contrary view Qualifications of general rule
629
Inferior courtsJurisdiction to appear on record
630
Merits of foreign judgments Not open to inquiry
631
SameConflicting views
632
Foreign judgmentsMay be impeached for fraud or want of jurisdiction
633
Judgments of sister states Want of jurisdiction may be shown
634
SameRegularity presumed Proofs of fraud
635
Domestic judgments not impeachable by parties for fraud
636
Judgments How proved Should be complete
637
Proof of parts of record Verdict
638
Proof of judgments in courts where rendered
639
Proof of records of courts in the same state
640
Mode of proof of foreign records
641
SameMode of authentication
642
Proof of records of sister states Federal statutes
643
Proof of judgments in federal courts
644
AuthenticationAttestation by clerk
645
SameCertificate of the judge
646
SameSeal
647
Returns of officers Not evidence of collateral facts
648
Depositions not admissible at common
651
Offers of compromise
655
Effect of paying money into court
659
SameObjections When made
664

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 30 - There must be reasonable evidence of negligence, but where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant that the accident arose from want of care.
Page 384 - The burden of proof as to any particular fact lies on that person who wishes the Court to believe in its existence unless it is provided by any law that the proof of that fact shall lie on any particular person.
Page 56 - the rule for jurisdiction is that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court but that which specially appears to be so, and, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court but that which is so expressly alleged;" and this rule has been so frequently repeated as to have become a maxim in the law.
Page 192 - ... was born during the continuance of a valid marriage between his mother and any man, or within two hundred and eighty days after its dissolution, the mother remaining unmarried, shall be conclusive proof that he is the legitimate son of that man, unless it can be shown that the parties to the marriage had no access to each other at any time when he could have been begotten.
Page 245 - The signing by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and by the President of the Senate, In open session, of an enrolled bill, is an official attestation by the two houses of such bill as one that has passed Congress.
Page 649 - A person may have exercised all the care which the law required, and yet, in the light of his new experience, after an unexpected accident has occurred, and as a measure of extreme caution, he may adopt additional safeguards.
Page 482 - ... that he has, in good faith, exhausted in a reasonable degree all the sources of information and means of discovery, which the nature of the case would naturally suggest, and which were accessible to him.
Page 284 - Again, it is said that the word "relevant," as applied to the admission of evidence, means that any two facts to which it is applied are so related to each other that according to the common course of events one of them, taken by itself or in connection with other facts, proves or renders probable the past, present, or future existence or nonexistence of the other.
Page 245 - That whenever a question arises in a court of law of the existence of a statute, or of the time when a statute took effect, or of the precise terms of a statute, the judges who are called upon to decide it have a right to resort to any Opinion of the Court.
Page 650 - People do not furnish evidence against themselves simply by adopting a new plan in order to prevent the recurrence of an accident. I think that a proposition to the contrary would be barbarous. It would be, as I have often had occasion to tell juries, to hold that, because the world gets wiser as it gets older, therefore it was foolish before.

Bibliographic information