Reports of Patent, Design, and Trade Mark Cases, Volume 91Published at the Patent Office Sales Branch, 1974 - Design protection |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 80
Page 197
... entitled . For these reasons 25 therefore I think the plaintiffs are entitled to the priority date of 22nd June 1961 for the claims of Mac 2 , and it follows that questions of prior user and the applicability of section 52 are not ...
... entitled . For these reasons 25 therefore I think the plaintiffs are entitled to the priority date of 22nd June 1961 for the claims of Mac 2 , and it follows that questions of prior user and the applicability of section 52 are not ...
Page 417
... entitled to the priority date of any of the French applications . This means that it can only be entitled to the date of the filing of the complete specification , 23rd January 1961 ; and , as the complete specification of Dr. Herchel ...
... entitled to the priority date of any of the French applications . This means that it can only be entitled to the date of the filing of the complete specification , 23rd January 1961 ; and , as the complete specification of Dr. Herchel ...
Page 621
... entitled so to describe or mark his goods as to represent that the goods are the goods of another . To the first proposition there is , I myself think , an exception : a man , in my opinion , is entitled to carry on his business in his ...
... entitled so to describe or mark his goods as to represent that the goods are the goods of another . To the first proposition there is , I myself think , an exception : a man , in my opinion , is entitled to carry on his business in his ...
Contents
CASES REPORTED | iii |
TRADE MARKS AND Trade Names | ix |
TABLE OF STATUTES AND STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS | xxiii |
3 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted action adhesive alleged allopurinol ampicillin Application 1974 argument basis Bermuda capsule carrier sheet Ch.D Chancery Division chlorodifluoromethane colour complete specification compound Comptroller concerned considered counsel David Kahn defendants DESIGN AND TRADE disclosed disclosure discovery documents drawings entitled evidence example fact filed furazolidone further Graham granted ground hearing officer IMPERIAL LEATHER indicia infringement injunction interlocutory invention inventive step judgment Letraset letters patent Limited Lord manufacture material matter method objection opponents original particular Patents Act Patents Appeal Tribunal petitioners plaintiffs polyester polyurethane position present prior art prior claiming priority date proceedings push member pyrolysis question reason referred refused regard registered design relation relevant REPORTS OF PATENT respect respondents sought stacking ring substance superintending examiner surface Texteam trade mark Trade Marks Act United Kingdom Upmann Valentino validity Whitford words