The American Journal of International Law, Volume 64James Brown Scott, George Grafton Wilson American Society of International Law, 1970 - Electronic journals The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 38
Page 306
... 2 of Protocol II not to contribute to violations of Article 1 were the United States to " collaborate " with a Contracting Party for the purpose of exploding a nuclear device for peaceful purposes in the territory of that Contracting ...
... 2 of Protocol II not to contribute to violations of Article 1 were the United States to " collaborate " with a Contracting Party for the purpose of exploding a nuclear device for peaceful purposes in the territory of that Contracting ...
Page 307
... Protocol II . The Status of Protocol II On April 1 , 1968 , the United States joined the United Kingdom as a signatory to Protocol II . The British had signed Protocol II on December 20 , 1967 , with a statement which was similar in ...
... Protocol II . The Status of Protocol II On April 1 , 1968 , the United States joined the United Kingdom as a signatory to Protocol II . The British had signed Protocol II on December 20 , 1967 , with a statement which was similar in ...
Page 309
... Protocol II towards that state . Mexico as depositary has not raised objection to any part of our statement . As far as the author is aware , no signatory has objected to the United States understandings regarding territory , transit ...
... Protocol II towards that state . Mexico as depositary has not raised objection to any part of our statement . As far as the author is aware , no signatory has objected to the United States understandings regarding territory , transit ...
Contents
The Place of International Law in the Settlement of Disputes by | 1 |
VOL 64 | 2 |
July 1970 NO | 3 |
Copyright | |
31 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted adopted agreement amendment American application Arab arbitration Article Assembly Beirut raid boundary Charter coastal Committee concerned Conference continental shelf Convention Court of Justice Dag Hammarskjöld decision disputes documents draft economic effect Egypt equidistance Faith Accord Falk force foreign Government guerrilla Hammarskjöld Human Rights Ibid Index International Court international law International Law Commission International Legal Israel Israeli issue jus cogens Law of Treaties Lebanon legislation limited Mandate ment National Petroleum Council negotiation nuclear weapons obligations Official Records Organization paragraph parties peace political practice principle problem procedure Professor proposed Protocol Protocol II question regard relations Report representative Republic resolution rôle rule Secretary Secretary-General Security Council Sess session settlement South West Africa Soviet territorial sea tion Treaty of Tlatelolco Treaty Series U.N. Doc UNCTAD UNEF United Arab Republic United Nations volume vote withdrawal World Bank World Bank Group York