7. Legality of combinations to raise wages; trades unions 8. Legality of combinations to quit employment; strikes 9. Liability for inducing refusal to deal; boycotts -10. Liability for inducing employee to quit employment, or em- 18. Nature and definition of monopolies 19. Origin and basis of doctrine against restrictions upon com- 22. Test of legality of restriction upon competition 23. Remote and permanent, as distinguished from immediate and temporary, effect of restriction upon competition. 24. Legality of restriction upon competition, as determined by 141 153 197 26. Agreements in restriction of competition; "pools;" "trusts" 27. Agreements to fix price or wages; "corners" 28. Criminal liability for restricting competition 29. Civil remedies in case of restriction upon competition; pro- TABLE OF CASES. References are to pages. Adler v. Fenton (24 How., U. S., | Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, etc. Ry. 407), 13. Ajello v. Worsley (1 L. R. Ch., 1898, 274), 5, 19. Aldridge v. Stuyvesant (1 Hall, N. Y., 210), 58. Alexandria Bay Steamboat Co. v. N. Y. Central, etc. R. R. Co. (18 Alger v. Thacher (19 Pick., Mass., 51), 113. Allen v. Flood (L. R. App. Cas., 1898, 1), 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 18, 24, 38, 49, 53, 58, 60, 61, 67, 68, 69. See Flood v. Jackson. Altgelt v. City of San Antonio (81 Tex. 436; s. c., 17 S. W. Rep. 75), 90. American Biscuit Manuf. Co. v. Klotz (44 Fed. Rep. 721), 96, 124, 149, 168. American Fire Ins. Co. v. State (- Miss. -; s. a., 22 So. Rep. 99), 148, 160. American Preservers' Trust Co. v. American Soda-Fountain Co. v. Co. (151 U. S. 1; s. c., 14 Supm. Ct. Rep. 240), 58. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assoc. v. Houck (27 S. W. Rep. 692), 106, 108, 129, 137, 143, 147, 171, 173. See Houck v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assoc. Arnot v. Pittston & Elmira Coal Co. (68 N. Y. 558), 127, 141, 170. Arthur v. Oakes (24 U. S. App. 239; S. C., 63 Fed. Rep. 310), 10, 13, 14, 15, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 36, 62, 81, 82, 121. See Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Northern Pacific R. R. Co. Ashley v. Dixon (48 N. Y. 430), 57, 58. Attorney-General, see also Stockton. Attorney-General, Matter of (22 N. Y. App. Div. 285; s. c., 47 N. Y. Suppl. 883), 107. Attorney-General v. Great Northern Ry. Co. (1 Drewry & Smale, 154), 162. Bagg's Case (11 Coke, 93b), 84. Nittany Valley R. R. Co. (171 Anderson v. Jett (89 Tex. 375; s. C., | Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Ral 12 S. W. Rep. 670), 126, 140. ston (41 Ohio St. 573), 146. References are to pages. Baltimore & Ohio Tel. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co. (24 Fed. Rep. 319), 93. Bancroft v. Thayer (5 Sawyer, 502), 88. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Brand (7 N. Y. Suppl. 744), 116. Barr v. Essex Trades Council (53 N. J. Eq. 101; s. c., 30 Atl. Rep. 881), 2, 5, 6, 14, 19, 24, 31, 34, 41, 42, 43, 48, 52, 56, 63, 73, 76, 78. Bartholomew v. City of Austin (52 U. S. App. 512; s. C., 85 Fed. Rep. 359), 90. Barton v. Mulvane (- Kan. Bowen v. Matheson (14 Allen, Mass., 499), 20. Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co. (125 U. S. 465; s. c., 8 Supm. Ct. Rep. 689), 108. Boyd v. American Carbon Black Co. (182 Pa. St. 206; s. c., 37 Atl. Rep. 937), 179. Boyson v. Thorn (98 Cal. 578; s. C., 33 Pac. Rep. 492), 5, 39, 57, 59. Brace v. Evans (3 Ry. & Corp. L. J. 561), 43, 57, 65, 78. Bradley v. Pierson (148 Pa. St. 502; S. C., 24 Atl. Rep. 65), 26. -; Bratt v. Swift (Wis. 75 N. W. Rep. 411), 161. Brett v. Ebel (29 N. Y. App. Div. 256; s. C., 51 N. Y. Suppl. 573), 119. Brewster v. Miller (— Ky. —; S. C., 41 S. W. Rep. 301), 13, 39, 161. Bromage v. Prosser (4 Barnewall & C. 247), 9. S. C., 52 Pac. Rep. 883), 169. -; S. C., Bingham v. Maigne (52 N. Y. Super. Brown v. N. Y. Central, etc. R. R. Ct. 90), 113. Bishop v. American Preservers' Co. (157 Ill. 284; s. c., 4 N. E. Rep. 765), 125, 151, 170, 179. Bishop v. American Preservers' Co. (51 Fed. Rep. 272), 161. Bishop v. Palmer (146 Mass. 469; S. C., 16 N. E. Rep. 299), 85, 114. Blindell v. Hagan (54 Fed. Rep. 40), 78, 165. See Hagan v. Blindell. Blumenthal v. Shaw (39 U. S. App. 490; s. C., 77 Fed. Rep. 954), 26. Bohn Manuf. Co. v. Hollis (54 Minn. 223; s. c., 55 N. W. Rep. 1119), 5, 16, 17, 18, 43, 50, 51, 70, 71, 76, 84, 161. Bourlier v. Macauley (91 Ky. 135; Co. (75 Hun, N. Y., 355; s. C., 27 N. Y. Suppl. 69), 91. Brown v. Rounsavell (78 Ill. 589), Bruschke v. Furniture Makers' S. C., 28 Atl. Rep. 195), 40, 71. Bowen v. Hall (6 L. R. Q. B. D. 333), | California 4, 58, 59, 60. Steam Nav. Co. V. Wright (6 Cal. 258), 95. References are to pages. Cameron v. Havemeyer (12 N. Y. Suppl. 126), 180. Cameron v. N. Y. & Mount Vernon Water Co. (62 Hun, N. Y., 269; S. C., 16 N. Y. Suppl. 757), 87. Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co. (17 Canada Supm. Ct. 151), 93. Capital & Counties Bank v. Henty (7 L. R. App. Cas. 741), 7. Chapin v. Brown (83 Iowa, 156; S. C., 48 N. W. Rep. 1074), 113, 126, 137. Chappel v. Brockway (21 Wend., N. Y., 157), 84, 99. Charles E. Wise wall, The (74 Fed. Rep. 802), 107, 169. Charles E. Wiswall, The (57 U. S. App. 179; s. C., 86 Fed. Rep. 671), 108, 169. Carew v. Rutherford (106 Mass. 1), Charles River Bridge v. Warren 10, 11, 14, 34, 45. Carnig v. Carr (167 Mass. 544; s. C., 46 N. E. Rep. 117), 103. Bridge (11 Peters, U. S.. 420), 88, 89. Chesley v. King (74 Me. 164), 5, 7. Carrington v. Taylor (11 East, 571), Chicago Gas-light & Coke Co. v. 2, 19. Carter Crume Co. v. Peurrung ( U. S. App. -; S. C., 86 Fed. Rep. 439), 85, 170. Casey v. Cincinnati Typographical Union (45 Fed. Rep. 135), 43, 56, 74, 77, 79, 82. Catawissa R. R. Co. v. Philadelphia & Reading R. R. Co. (14 Pa. Co. Ct. 280), 178. Catt v. Tourle (38 L. J. Ch. 665), 102. Central & Montgomery R. R. Co. v. Morris (68 Tex. 49; s. c., 3 S. W. Rep. 457), 178. Central Ohio Salt Co. v. Guthrie (35 Ohio St. 666), 96, 115, 128, 138, 140, 148, 165. People's Gas-light & Coke Co. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Pullman Southern Car Co. (139 Central R. R. Co. v. Collins (40 Ga. Citizens' Gas-Light Co. v. Louisville 582), 124, 178. Central Shade Roller Co. v. Cush man (143 Mass. 353; s. c., 9 N. E. Rep. 629), 95, 100, 139, 142, 155, 177. Central Trust Co. v. Ohio Central Ry. Co. (23 Fed. Rep. 306), 132, 167. Chambers v. Baldwin (91 Ky. 121; s. c., 15 S. W. Rep. 57), 5, 58, 59. B Gas Co. (81 Ky. 263), 89. City of Brenham v. Brenham Water Co. (67 Tex. 542; s. C., 4 S. W. Rep. 143), 90. City of Laredo v. International Bridge & Tramway Co. (30 U.S. App. 110; s. C., 66 Fed. Rep. 246), 90. City of St. Louis v. St. Louis Gaslight Co. (70 Mo. 69), 87. |