...the affidavit of Orrin Miller, a rule was entered against Rufus J. Harvey, an attorney of this court, requiring him to show cause why his name should not be stricken from the roll of attorneys, for the reasons stated in the affidavit. At the same term of this court Francis Burnap moved, on his...

...professional misconduct by the respondent, John L. Metzen, an attorney of this court, and calling upon him to show cause why his name should not be stricken from the roll of attorneys. His answer was filed on March 15, igi8, and the cause was referred to Ninian H. Welch, a master in...

...of others. This was a rule against Josiah Lamborn, an attorney and counsellor of the Supreme Court, to show cause why his name should not be stricken from the Roll of Attorneys. Julius C. Wright, the relator, filed an affidavit in the nature of an information, in this Court, against...

...same, it shall be lawful for any person interested" to apply to this court for a rule upon the attorney to show cause •why his name should not be stricken from the roll. This statute can not receive the narrow construction, that the person who may make the application...

...shall then be summoned by the Recording Secretary to appear before the Academy after one week's notice, to show cause why his name should not be stricken from the roll of Fellows for the non-payment of dues ; and failing to do so, it shall be submitted to a vote, and if...

...on the relation of George RH Hughes, filed in this court, against Samuel Appleton, asking for a rule to show cause why his name should not be stricken from the roll of attorneys of this State. The rule having been granted, cause has been shown. The case presented before us is...

...court one morning with a rule, prepared, against Alexander Walker, a member of the bar of said court, to show cause why his name should not be stricken from the roll of attorneys; that the said rule was immediately served, and the said Walker forced to trial without any time for...

[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ]

...October 8, 1859, Mr. Carnahan, on behalf of the examining committee, entered a rule on James E. Brown to show cause why his name should not be stricken from the roll of attorneys, for the alleged reason that a fraud had been practised on the court and committee as to his residence,...

...endeavor to show the sufficiency of the return to the rule. The rule requires that the respondent should show cause why his name should not be stricken from the roll of attorneys of this Court for contempt in refusing to state the whereabouts of his client, ET Avery, for whom bail...