The American Journal of International Law, Volume 25American Society of International Law, 1931 - Electronic journals The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 77
Page 345
... position vis - à - vis the Moroccan authorities inferior to that recognized as the right of any individual European ressortissant . We do not believe such a position to be admissible , because the Commission , having derived its ...
... position vis - à - vis the Moroccan authorities inferior to that recognized as the right of any individual European ressortissant . We do not believe such a position to be admissible , because the Commission , having derived its ...
Page 710
... position of international functionaries . If the guarantee of immunities is essential to the independence of such officials , there can be no valid reason for making a distinction among them on the basis of their nationality . If the ...
... position of international functionaries . If the guarantee of immunities is essential to the independence of such officials , there can be no valid reason for making a distinction among them on the basis of their nationality . If the ...
Page 718
... position . The British view , expressed more frequently than the American , holds that disarmament is the proper path to security and peace . This seems to be , to a large extent , a rationalization of a wish , designed to give logical ...
... position . The British view , expressed more frequently than the American , holds that disarmament is the proper path to security and peace . This seems to be , to a large extent , a rationalization of a wish , designed to give logical ...
Contents
NINTH YEAR OF THE PERMANENT COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE M O Hudson | 1 |
VIOLATIONS OF Maritime Law by Allied Powers During WORLD WAR J | 26 |
SUITS AGAINST FOREIGN STATES J Y Brinton | 50 |
33 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
advisory opinion agents agreement amendment American application Arbitral Tribunal Article award belligerent blockade bonds Britain British Cecil Hurst claimant claims Colombia commercial Commission Committee compromis Conference conflict of laws Constitution contraband contract convention Council countries Court of International decision Declaration of London declared diplomatic diplomatic representative dispute Droit International effect evidence fact fire foreign France French Geneva German Government Grantnor Guanta Hague Herrmann Hinsch Ibid immunity interest International Justice international law Irish Free JOURNAL judges judicial jurisdiction juristic personality jurists Kristoff League of Nations legislation Martini Company ment Mexico Minister neutral Nicaragua obligations officers parties Permanent Court political present President principle protocol question Ratification recognition recognized reference regard relations rules Russian Secretary Sept session settlement sovereignty Soviet Soviet decrees Statute submitted territory Text tion Treaty of Versailles Treaty Series United Venezuela Wozniak