The American Journal of International Law, Volume 27American Society of International Law, 1933 - Electronic journals The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 84
Page 25
... fact that they were " formu- lated as questions purely in abstracto . " Points 1 , 2 and 3 are " formulated in terms which go beyond the facts out of which the dispute has arisen , " and as they go beyond the questions which were ...
... fact that they were " formu- lated as questions purely in abstracto . " Points 1 , 2 and 3 are " formulated in terms which go beyond the facts out of which the dispute has arisen , " and as they go beyond the questions which were ...
Page 497
... fact , the treaty which was ultimately concluded contained no reference to the prohibition on China in regard to the construction of railways in Manchuria . In this connection China com- plained that she has often in the past been the ...
... fact , the treaty which was ultimately concluded contained no reference to the prohibition on China in regard to the construction of railways in Manchuria . In this connection China com- plained that she has often in the past been the ...
Page 745
... fact that the United States has taken no step to recognize the existing government in Russia is of no importance so far as the internal affairs of that country are concerned . " The fact that the existence of a foreign power has been ...
... fact that the United States has taken no step to recognize the existing government in Russia is of no importance so far as the internal affairs of that country are concerned . " The fact that the existence of a foreign power has been ...
Contents
BOYCOTT IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS C C Hyde and Louis B Wehle | 1 |
ELEVENTH YEAR OF THE PERMANENT COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE M 0 | 11 |
MEANING OF THE PACT OF PARIS Quincy Wright | 39 |
23 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acts agreement aliens American application arbitral tribunal Article authority award boundary Britain British Chevreau China claim Colombia colonies Commission Committee conclusion Conference conflict Connecticut River Constitution convention coöperation Council countries Court of Arbitration Covenant Danzig decision declared diplomatic dispute documents draft Droit International economic effect evidence extradition fact force foreign France French Geneva Government Greenland Guatemala Hague Honduras international law Italy Japan Japanese Jehol JOURNAL July June jurisdiction League of Nations letters London Manchukuo Manchuria March ment Mexico Motagua River neutrality Norway obligations Office opinion Pact Paris parties peace Permanent Court Peru Postal present President principle Protocol provisions question Ratification deposited recognized regard relations reprisal River rule seizures Sept settlement sovereignty status submitted supra territory tion trade Treaty of Berne Treaty of Versailles Treaty Series Union United uti possidetis vessel violation Wozniak