The American Journal of International Law, Volume 46American Society of International Law, 1952 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 80
Page 485
... Opinion In the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly , the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice , which was accompanied by two dis- senting opinions , one of four judges and another of one judge , met with varied ...
... Opinion In the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly , the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice , which was accompanied by two dis- senting opinions , one of four judges and another of one judge , met with varied ...
Page 626
... opinion , in conformity with international law . He found two obvious instances where , in his opinion , the base lines were not justifiably drawn , namely , the line across the " Svaerholthav " 38.6 miles long and that across the ...
... opinion , in conformity with international law . He found two obvious instances where , in his opinion , the base lines were not justifiably drawn , namely , the line across the " Svaerholthav " 38.6 miles long and that across the ...
Page 688
... opinion of the Chief Justice , for himself and two of his brethren , considered first the matter of the United Nations Charter , and found that none of the provisions relied upon invalidated the Land Law . Marshall's opinion in Foster v ...
... opinion of the Chief Justice , for himself and two of his brethren , considered first the matter of the United Nations Charter , and found that none of the provisions relied upon invalidated the Land Law . Marshall's opinion in Foster v ...
Contents
July 1952 NO | 3 |
VOL 46 | 67 |
The Pella Memoranda Relating to International Crimes and Criminal Jurisdiction | 129 |
Copyright | |
23 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted acts adopted aggression alien American Anglo-Iranian Oil Company Annex application arbitration Article Assembly authority British Charter China Chinese Eastern Railway claims Compensation Office compulsory jurisdiction Conference Constitution countries Court of Justice Covenant crimes decision Declaration Decree diplomatic dispute Draft Statute Droit International effect enemy established federal fisheries foreign Germany Government Hague Human Rights Ibid individual International Court International Criminal Court International Law Commission Iran Iranian Japan Japanese JOURNAL judges judgment judicial League of Nations legislation limited ment military multilateral conventions national law Norway Norwegian object obligations offenses opinion organization pars parties Peace Treaty persons political principles prisoners of war problem proposed provisions question ratification regard relations Report representative reservations rule Security Council South Manchuria Railway sovereign Soviet Union Supp Swiss territorial waters tion tional Tribunal U.N. Doc United Kingdom United Nations United Nations Charter World Yalta Agreement