The American Journal of International Law, Volume 38American Society of International Law, 1944 - International law The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 155
... decision , how- ever , only went to the extent of allowing an enemy to raise any defence founded on The Hague Convention , as had already been done in the English Prize Court , and to extend that indulgence to any enemy who based his ...
... decision , how- ever , only went to the extent of allowing an enemy to raise any defence founded on The Hague Convention , as had already been done in the English Prize Court , and to extend that indulgence to any enemy who based his ...
Page 321
... decision to employ sanctions " must be entrusted " to a federal council or even to independent executive authorities " this reviewer takes it that he is not thinking primarily of the decision of a dispute found justifiable by the Court ...
... decision to employ sanctions " must be entrusted " to a federal council or even to independent executive authorities " this reviewer takes it that he is not thinking primarily of the decision of a dispute found justifiable by the Court ...
Page 489
... decision in Kansas v . Colorado , supra , amounted to an allocation of the flow of the Arkansas River between the two States We cannot accept this view . In that case Kansas labored under a burden of proof applicable in litigation ...
... decision in Kansas v . Colorado , supra , amounted to an allocation of the flow of the Arkansas River between the two States We cannot accept this view . In that case Kansas labored under a burden of proof applicable in litigation ...
Contents
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL | 2 |
THE COÖRDINATION OF INTERAMERICAN PEACE AGREEMENTS | 4 |
THE COÖRDINATION OF INTERAMERICAN PEACE AGREEMENTS Charles G Fenwick | 20 |
29 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adopted agreement Allied appear application April arbitration Argentina Article Assembly Austria authority Axis Britain British Buenos Aires cited claim Commission Committee Conference Congress Constitution Convention coöperation coördination Council decision declaration delegates diplomatic discussion disputes district court Dominion draft economic enemy established Ex parte United forces foreign France French German Government Hague hostages Ibid immunity Inter-American interest international law issue JOURNAL jurisdiction Justice League of Nations Lebanon legislation Lend-Lease London matter ment military Minister navicert neutral neutral countries Office opinion organization Pan American Union parties peace Permanent Court persons Poland post-war practice present President principle problems procedure proposed provisions question Reich relations representative Republic resolution Rio de Janeiro rule Scott Senate Sept settlement sovereign sovereignty Soviet Statute supra Syria territory tion treaty Treaty Series United Kingdom United Nations University Washington writs York