The Lost Art of Declaring War
Historically, it has been assumed that war is violence and declarations
of war are simply public announcements that serve to initiate combat.
Brien Hallett denies both assumptions and claims that war is policy, not
The Lost Art of Declaring War analyzes the crucial differences
between combat and war and convincingly argues that the power to "declare"
war is in actuality the power to compose a text, draft a document, write
a denunciation. Once written, the declaration then serves three functions:
to articulate the political purposes of the war, to guide and direct military
operations, and to establish the boundary between justified combat and
Hallett sounds a clarion call urging the people and their representatives
to take up the challenge and write fully reasoned declarations of war.
Then, and only then, can a civilized nation like the United States lay
claim to being fully democratic, not only in peacetime, but in wartime
"Brien Hallett has fashioned an original, incisive, and powerful
argument for the proper standards for going to war. Tightly reasoned throughout
and well timed to address the conceptual confusion that now reigns."
-- Louis Fisher, author of Presidential War Power
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
able American analysis appears armed articulated attack authority become begins called cause century clear combat commander-in-chief commanders committees concerns condition conduct Congress congressional Consequently constitutional contest continued convention council course created Cuba Cuban debate decision declaration of war declare war democracy develop direct draft economic effect enemy enmity established example executive exists fact finally forces formal declaration fully reasoned declaration function Government grand strategic grievances Grotius hand hostilities House important Independence initial interest issue justice justify king Korea less matter means military necessary negotiations never objective officer operations passed peace political possessed possible practice precisely President principal question relations Representatives resolution respect response result sanctions Second Senate sense situation specificity strategy successful tion United Vietnam violence vote wars whereas